Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Please welcome and support our new author Kalika Gold and support her petition to have the Merseyside model adopted by all British police forces.

The Petition

The petition aims to extend the Merseyside Police’s strategy (declaring all crimes against sex workers hate crimes and working in partnership with sex workers’ organisations to catch violent criminals) to all UK police forces.

You can sign it now:

SEE HERE

The petition isn’t in my name because for Government petitions, a legal name and current address are required. All names and addresses are verified – which took a week- before petitions are made visible. The name is publically visible on the petition. Although I’m currently still studying, I’m worried that future employers might discriminate against me when I graduate and enter the job market. I could have done a Change.org petition, but a Government petition has more chance of success because if we get 100,000 signatures by 22 October 2013, the petition will have to be debated in Parliament.
So, mental health professional Jayne Rogers created the petition out of a text that I drafted (the text is written to appeal to antis and feminists as well, which is why the term “prostitution” appears alongside “sex work”.) Jayne Rogers is neither a sex worker nor an anti. She is against the Nordic model and believes everyone has the right to enter sex work if they wish to. I interviewed her (see link below) so you can all see that she’s coming from a position of care, not to rescue sex workers or fulfil a personal agenda.

About the “Merseyside model”

In 2006, Merseyside police declared crimes against sex workers hate crimes, following the efforts of Armistead Street (a Liverpool sex work outreach and support project). In Liverpool, in 2009, police convicted 90% of rapists who raped sex workers. In 2010, the overall conviction rate in Merseyside for crimes against sex workers was 84%. The rape conviction rate was 67% – the national average rape conviction rate is only 6.5%. Merseyside police also work in partnership with sex worker organisations to catch violent criminals, and arrest street sex workers (street sex work is a crime) only as a last resort, leading to less arrests of street sex workers. (A perfect model would include not arresting street sex workers at all, but the Merseyside model is an improvement even if it’s not perfect.)

UKNSWP supports the Merseyside model and recommended it in their submission to the Justice Committee.

In a report commissioned by the Mayor of London Boris Johnson, Andrew Boff (a Conservative member of the London Assembly) recommends all crimes against sex workers should be treated as hate crimes. The National Association of Police Chiefs has stated that the Merseyside model should be adopted by all UK police forces -that crimes against sex workers should be treated as hate crimes (ACPO Guidelines on Policing Prostitution and Sexual Exploitation Strategy p8), that the police should collaborate with sex workers’ organisations to catch violent offenders and avoid arresting street workers until they continue to work despite being encouraged to exit the industry (Ibid p5 and 6). This was recommended in 2010, but nothing has been done about it.

Links:
The Merseyside model: SEE HERE

UKNSWP written submission to the Justice Committee (see p4):
SEE HERE

The ACPO Guidelines: SEE HERE

Andrew Boff tells the Huffington Post why he supports the Merseyside model: SEE HERE

Andrew Boff speaks briefly here: SEE HERE

Interview with Jayne Rogers: SEE HERE

Shelly Stoops and Rosie Campbell write about the Merseyside model for RH Reality Check:
SEE HERE

Kate Zen writes for Tits and Sass: SEE HERE

Dr Brooke Magnanti mentions the Merseyside model in her Telegraph column: SEE HERE

Shelly Stoops’ presentation on the Merseyside model: SEE HERE

Many people will notice that we already have sponsorship for Harlots. Sponsors receive an advertising spot on the right hand side of the site, in the form of a banner. I am glad to say that our sponsors have been loyal and many have supported the site for many years.

If you would like to join our sponsors the costs are £20 per annum (some of course do give more). This helps with administration and hosting fees. If you would like to help support this blog and would like to advertise your business/agency/indie site or whatever then please email me at dearharlot@googlemail.com or give me a call on 020 7175 0050. You can pay into the bank discreetly or by paypal. Once received all you have to do is email me and include your logo and links.

Sponsorship is not to make a profit but simply to help cover the general costs of keeping Harlots going. All of our authors write for free. General links to other sex worker bloggers will always be listed free of charge.

As a gesture to support the UKNSWP Ugly Mug Scheme…Harlots will donate a third of your sponsorship fee toward this good cause. Every little helps to raise money for another essential service for sex workers.

Thank you.
The editors of Harlots.

An excellent article by our new author SexworkIE.

No More Traffik (NMT) SEE HERE
is a week of anti-trafficking events taking place in Northern Ireland. It starts next Saturday, 11th May, and this is its second year running. As Northern Irish anti-trafficking groups and individuals are getting exited I instead find myself concerned by developments here.

Whilst the organisers say NMT is not a Christian charity, a prayer room is being provided for the week and many of the events, sponsors, partners and individuals involved are clearly religious.

NMT is fundraising for their work and when I looked at their website a few days ago I noticed they are also fundraising for an organisation called Solas Trust SEE HERE
.

Solas Trust’s mission is to provide residential care, refuge, restoration and rehabilitation for women and young girls who have been trafficked for sexual exploitation and/or prostitution and NMT is fundraising specifically for security features for their new safe house.

Solas Trust has produced two videos about their plans which I found disturbing viewing. These slick videos both open with emotive made-up stories of women and girls being sex trafficked in Ireland.

The first video SEE HERE
goes on to introduce Mike and Ros Oman, the religious couple who plan to run the Solas Trust home, and others involved in anti-trafficking efforts in Northern Ireland. Ros Oman says women will stay in the home for 45 days to 2 years, and Solas Trust won’t be doing the “rescuing” themselves, rather they will be taking rescued women from other sources, possibly Women’s Aid or Migrant Help in Northern Ireland, or from other countries. Mike Oman, who self-styles himself as the “father of the fatherless” talks about wanting to be a father to these abused women and girls and of helping them discover God and experience restoration in Christ. Frankly I find him creepy.

The second video SEE HERE
also starts with a fictional story, this time of a “little girl” sex trafficked into Ireland. The narrator tells us this girl will be repeatedly forced to do “things no decent person would ever imagine”. Whilst nobody is advocating for forced or underage prostitution, Solas Trust appear to be saying here that prostitution itself is something no “decent” person could imagine, revealing that they are also anti-sex work. The video goes on to show a potter making a vase out of scraps of clay, this being a symbolism of the reclamation of sex trafficked girls.

You can look upon all this as religious people wanting to do good work and help victims of sex trafficking and see nothing wrong with it. But things that have happened in other countries and in Irish history tell us we should be concerned by these developments in Northern Ireland.

Whilst the focus of NMT is abolition of trafficking, we know that many anti-trafficking groups and individuals in Northern Ireland are equally anti-sex work. There are currently political moves for Northern Ireland to adopt the “Swedish Model” of criminalising the purchase of sex.

The anti-trafficking movement in Northern Ireland is very Protestant and there are a great number of anti-trafficking organisations.

In the US Protestant theology on sexual morality was allowed to dominate Government policy on trafficking under the Bush Administration and this led to damaging policies being introduced, like the 2003 Anti-Prostitution Loyalty Oath (APLO), which required NGOs and health service providers receiving funding through the President’s Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to sign an oath opposing prostitution. This oath made it impossible for organisations that serve sex workers around the world to get US funding and halted the distribution of condoms amongst other essential services.

For a fuller understanding of how Protestantism has influenced US anti-trafficking policy in recent years I’d recommend Yvonne Zimmerman’s Other Dreams of Freedom, which also explores other ideas of freedom in relation to sex work and sex trafficking, beyond Protestant ideology on sex.

Getting back to Northern Ireland, sex workers and sex worker allies don’t want to see people abused in prostitution. It would be nice if anti-trafficking organisations recognised that and made efforts to include sex workers. If people are being forced into prostitution, sex workers and others who know the sex industry are ideally placed to be part of efforts to try to stop such abuses.

It also needs to be noted that when we talk about sex trafficking victims, we may very well actually be talking about sex workers. Under UK law for sex trafficking there is no requirement for force or coercion to be involved. One sex worker buying another sex worker a plane ticket, one sex worker giving another sex worker a lift between two places, these everyday scenarios can all be interpreted by the police as trafficking. UK law also forces sex workers to work alone in order to work legally. Sex workers in Northern Ireland have been heard to say that when they are visited by police and found to be not working alone that the police instead of pressing a brothel keeping charge now simply say that they are trafficked. Trafficking is now where the money is and is much easier to prove because of the wide interpretation within the law.

Potentially Solas Trust might not even be the only organisation planning to open a home for sex trafficking victims. The Freedom Project Ireland’s SEE HERE
front page says “As more victims are rescued, FPI intends to develop an intensive rehabilitation service to assist victims as they heal.” Money seems to feature high on the radar of these anti trafficking groups.
A check back on the NMT website reveals they’ve just added a new fundraising project, details are “coming soon” entitled “Rescue Operations” and the International Justice Mission (IJM) logo is shown. Again I am concerned. This would be the same IJM whose brothel raids conducted with police to “rescue” sex workers have drawn criticism from human rights advocates around the world. Melissa Gira Grant SEE HERE
offers useful further reading on this topic.

Ireland is a country with a long history of so called “fallen women” being rehabilitated in homes operated by the religious. The Catholic “Magdalene Laundries” the last of which only closed in 1996, have now been shown beyond all doubt to have been inhumane forced labour institutions. This topic has been in the world news recently as this year the Irish Government finally accepted the State’s collusion in the admission of thousands of women into these institutions. I am talking about the Catholic Church and the Republic of Ireland here not Northern Ireland and the Protestant Church, although there were also Northern Irish and Protestant operated institutions for “fallen women.”

I am sure Solas Trust and others involved in anti-trafficking work in Northern Ireland would say any plans they have to run homes for sex trafficking victims would be nothing like Magdalene Laundries. But the religious running such homes in Ireland have always promoted themselves as all wonderful, whilst the reality for people living in them has often been horrific. Questions must be asked about the suitability of religious operating homes for vulnerable people because of the history of such institutions in Ireland (and indeed the world).

I’m also irked to find this video of the “Father of the fatherless” and his wife discussing running a home for sex trafficking victims in Northern Ireland, because it is clear that this will also be a home where rescued “victims” will be subjected to Protestant religious indoctrination. I believe in respecting people and their beliefs. This type of pushing of ideology and religion onto vulnerable people concerns me greatly.

I am also concerned that Solas Trust says it may receive “rescued” women and girls from Northern Irish organisations like Women’s Aid or Migrant Help. These two organisations are Government funded to support potential victims of trafficking. I find the idea of persons identified by the police as potential victims of trafficking being referred to Women’s Aid or Migrant Help, then ending up in a religious run home for 45 days to 2 years very concerning. I find the idea of people being brought from anywhere in the world into such a home concerning. Its one thing adults who freely decide they want to enter a religious home doing so but in this case we are talking about potentially very vulnerable people here. Ireland’s history of placing women and girls who were sexually abused or sex workers into religious homes is long and shameful and we must make sure it doesn’t happen again.

Reblogged from Sia in Edinburgh:

I've often wondered what it’s like in strip or lap dancing clubs. I finally found out during my last visit to London. I was curious about how the girls behave and even more intrigued about how the men behave. As an escort I was also interested in finding out how dancers view themselves and their decisions to become dancers. Another thing I wondered about was whether they thought that dancing was somehow “better” than escorting.

Read more… 1,197 more words

I’ve often wondered what it’s like in strip or lap dancing clubs. I finally found out during my last visit to London. I was curious about how the girls behave and even more intrigued about how the men behave. As an escort I was also interested in finding out how dancers view themselves and their decisions to become dancers. Another thing I wondered about was whether they thought that dancing was somehow “better” than escorting. Apart from the sociological aspects of it I was also very curious about my own reaction and how I would behave and whether I would find the experience erotic…I am happy to report that I did!
Read More I enjoyed reading your article. I am slightly surprised you have not visited any of the numerous lap dancing clubs in Edinburgh. Maybe opportunity, and of course discretion. Yes it's a shame sex workers have these strata, and some dancers don't consider escorts worthy. It's the same with porn stars, often looking down on prostitutes. These strata divide sex workers. We need to unite, prostitutes, dancers, cam girls, porn actors are all under attack by the abolitionists. Divided we fall, United we will succeed. I also get annoyed by the LGBT groups who often condemn prostitution, sex work is stigmatised, don't these groups, (I include Stephen Fry here because he is often supporting abolitionist anti trafficking organisations) forget the stigma and the dangerous laws that affected them. I would hope they would support decriminalisation, as a way to may our lives safer as it did for them.  


I have been asked by a sex worker friend who has written a superb book if I would help. She is trying to raise funds to promote her book to reach as wide an audience as possible. Like many authors today she is self publishing. Getting book deals, even with a well written book is not easy and even if an author does secure a deal the chances of making any money from their work is virtually nil for lots of reason. This is why many authors are now self publishing, Self publishing allows authors control over their work and gives them a greater return on sales. The big draw back however is that you have to promote and advertise your work which costs money.
I have read this particular book and have previously written a review for it on Harlots. It is very good and as Aphrodite suggests could be very useful in the battle for rights. If you could help her raise the funding she needs to publicise her work so that it will reach the widest audience I am sure she would be very grateful. Every piece of work helps in the battle for rights.
It would also be helpful if other bloggers could help publicise the book and of course I urge readers to purchase the book.

Below is her email explaining what she is doing.

I am a sex worker and author/advocate for sex workers’ rights. I have
written a book entitled Are They Bad Girls or Brilliant?. If you visit the
book website, http://www.aphroditephoenix.com, you’ll find excerpts and rave
reviews.

2booksnew8-2011

The print version just came out on Amazon and I will soon be presenting
the Kindle version at an extremely low price.

I am confident that if fence-riders read this book, their views about sex
work, the human rights of sex workers, and a woman’s right to choose the
work will morph to wholehearted support. I feel that my arguments are so
powerfully presented, written with such emotional appeal, and are so
well-sourced, that even if the extreme opposition experiences this book,
many will find themselves dismantling their views.

I am seeking help to promote this book in order to enlighten the world
about the true nature of sex work, which is empowering for independent sex
workers, healing for clients, and eternally and rightfully needed. Any
donation, no matter how small, will help with the promotion. Go to
http://www.gofundme.com/2p55qw if you’d like to contribute. Thank you so
much!

Sincerely,

Aphrodite Phoenix

One of the reasons I love sex work is the freedom. That word “Freedom” may have sex work abolitionists reaching for their Kalashnikovs and screaming elitist and in fact it will probably have some sex worker activists doing the same. Sex work however, what ever its detractors may say, is one of the few areas of work that allows the worker a wide variety of choices in how they work, where they work and when they work. It is also one of the few areas of work that provides a relatively good instant return, cash in hand, for those with out qualifications or with few choices or options and who need to make money quickly and anonymously. It is also an option equally for those who aspire and also for those who would never comfortably fit into orthodox society. Sex work has for myself provided support while I created other businesses and carved out other creative opportunities. I, unlike many people, have been incredibly lucky because I have always chosen how I want to work and have enjoyed those choices. Few people can say that about their work life.

This unique freedom within sex work is something rarely talked about but in essence is an essential reason for why sex work survives and flourishes no matter how oppressive any regimes sanctions against it. There will always be those in any society who need to or who chooses to look for work that is often chaotic, marginalised but never the less is profitable and flexible.

Sex is one of those few areas of human activity which requires, maintains and welcomes diverse, sometimes chaotic, always individualistic and often marginalised individuals who are willing to service the human sexual imagination. Governments and moralists may not like this truth but never the less they will always be thwarted in their attempts to control human sexuality because orthodox society will always fantasise and there will always be individuals who will service those fantasies, those needs.

Anti sex work groups, so called feminists and moralists will always collude to excite governments into persecuting sex workers, they will reinvent the language of moralism and oppression to service current political angsts, such as gender equality or some new ideal of saving women unwilling to behave correctly. Ultimately however they will fail because they always ignore the unpalatable truth that sex work is not oppression for women (or men) but an opportunity. It may be an opportunity taken after all orthodox channels have failed but never the less sex work provides what moralists can’t and that is a “real” means to achieve a real “goal”.

Saving “fallen women” and then offering them poor choices, such as become a “domestic, learn to sew, flip burgers” and other alternatives that fail to meet the aspirations of women and men who have chosen sex work exhibits an ignorance of human nature, human ambition. What these moralists and so called feminists are truly doing is revealing the condescension implicit in any moral crusade, implicit when ever the privileged condescend to help those they consider less privileged. Their ideal being that we will make those “saved” like us except of course the saved women or men in truth will never be like their saviours, they will always be, if no longer “fallen” women, then “saved women” which carries as much societal stigma. Guilt has never put food on the table but sex work delivers. Obviously people will fail in sex work. Sex work is work, even if sometimes chaotic and like all work it requires a degree of commitment and a certain mindset. Sex work is not for every one but that is no reason to persecute all sex workers or to deliberately make their work unnecessarily dangerous.

History has proven that it is impossible to regulate or control sex work by imposing legislation that reflects a moralist agenda. Such legislation has always had negative consequences for sex workers. Governments must instead eventually prioritise the human rights and the safety of sex workers. To do this means that governments will eventually have to look to decriminalise laws that make sex work dangerous. Governments negotiating to decriminalise must however learn to listen to the many diverse voices and experiences within sex work. Most important is that governments in creating any future legislation must resist their natural desire to over regulate the ungovernable. Over regulation, even if done with the best intentions does not work with sex work. History has shown that over regulation often creates opportunities for exploitation and fails sex workers. Future government regulation will need to be flexible enough to engage with the diverse nature of sex work and the people who work in the industry and like wise sex worker activists engaged in negotiation must also be flexible and pragmatic.

Sex worker activists who speak to government must be realistic in negotiating with orthodoxy in order to achieve the maximum protection for the greater number of sex workers. As sex workers we learn to negotiate in our work and we must use those same skills when negotiating with authorities to achieve a desired outcome. Decriminalisation is not rocket science but to achieve it we need sex work activists with imagination. Activists in turn need the support of an industry that is willing to explain that sex work provides for huge numbers a unique means to an end which hurts few but calms, enchants and pleases many. Sex workers are part of society who do not want honours, rather they prefer anonymity. Sex workers however do want respect and understanding and most importantly protection.

In Bindel Tales I explored the lies told about myself by the journalist and so called feminists Julie Bindel in her article about the IUSW (International Union of Sex Workers). What I did not explore were the many other reasons why people should avoid this woman and her new magazine called Gaze review.

Matther Buckley in his brilliant article “The Treachery of Gaze Review” further explores Julie Bindel and her friends deeply entrenched dislike of trans people and also of gay men.
Part of his article follows with link to full article:

It would be a candy floss conceit in daring to believe homophobia and transphobia were a thing of the past. Because many of us have straight friends, a delusion can occur, whereupon in their minds they imagine the world at large to be comfortably accommodating of their sexuality. If this was only true. We’ve come so far. We’ve a long way to go. Bigotry exists, and not only in the outside world. It exists amongst us.

The large striped umbrella that still is the LGBT community – a floppy, saggy umbrella, yes – but one that just about keeps a necessary cohesion and a way in and out to accommodate many varied people with often radically different lifestyles. There are reasons why the LGBT community matters. Bigotry and the fight against it is best tackled in numbers. It provides services and safety nets to those unsure of their sexuality, those coming out, people battling with gender dysphoria, and it engenders a loosely defined sense of unity, though L, G, B & T are in and of themselves as different as the moon and stars.

One important aspect of the LGBT community has always been the part that gender studies and politics in particular has played. Historically, of course, the debate for this was limited to lecture halls and universities, and information was culled from gay print publications. Now, thankfully, we can all have a voice, the downside being it can often be lost without being heard. So, initially I was interested to hear of a new online/iPad magazine, Gaze, which, on the surface seemed to promise something different from what some of the older, established magazines had offered – magazines that had been primarily been targeted towards gay men. Superficially, it seemed Gaze Review was reaching out to the LGBT community. I was wrong about this.

This next bit isn’t meant to condescend, but it’s important and simple – Lesbian – Gay – Bisexual – Transgender. That’s what the acronym LGBT stands for. I state that, because it makes what follows fall into place very quickly.

Even amongst progressives, perhaps the most marginalised, stigmatised, and misunderstood in the LGBT community are the Transgender population. I’m a gay man, and whilst many didn’t have the easy experience I did, my struggle to accept “who I was” was mere piffle compared to the years of dysphoria, fears of familial rejection, which are often not unfounded, up until recently, near ridicule in the medical profession, and in public and in the press, often outright derision and mockery.

It is only now that issues such as gender reassignment are being treated as seriously as they should – not only for the individual on health and emotional levels, but also financially. The cost of reassignment surgery in the long term, a far more reasonable option than the chronic ongoing issues of treating mental health issues such as the incumbent periods of major depressive disorder, and alarmingly high suicide rates. It costs far less to perform vocal cord surgery on a male to female reassignment patient, for example, than it does to keep an attempted suicide patient in an intensive care bed for one night.

The route to for any individual seeking reassignment is a long, arduous one. As gay men and women, there is no denying that many of us have dreadful, sickening stories of rejection and betrayal to tell, which are no less painful. But for a person seeking their true selves in a different sex, this process takes years of proving. Granted, this is as much of a guarantor as anything else, yet I can still imagine the abject humiliations and frustrations encountered along the way.

Why does this have anything to with Gaze?

At the helm of this publication, is Managing Editor, Julie Bindel. If you haven’t heard of her, the Transgender Community certainly have. Ms. Bindel is a widely acknowledged to be Transphobic. And I’m putting that in the most conservative of terms. Julie Bindel is also a Feminist Lesbian.

Ms. Bindel wrote an article for The Guardian, entitled, “Gender Benders, beware”, in which she expressed in pungent terms her distaste, in particular, for male to female transsexuals and transsexualism. A lot of people were extremely repulsed by the tone and tenor of her writing, and The Guardian received short shrift for printing the article. The paper received hundreds of letters of complaint from those in academia, medical professors, doctors, therapists, and the transgender community, as well as those supportive of the transgender community. Press for Change quoted this article as an example of “discriminatory writing about transsexual people in the press”.

The greatest offence was focused on particular remarks Bindel wrote in the column, such as, “I don’t have a problem with men disposing of their genitals, but it does not make them women, in the same way that shoving a piece of vacuum hose down your 501’s jeans does not make you a man”, and, “Think about a world inhabited just by transsexuals. It would look like the set of Grease“. Further consternation and revulsion was reported toward the accompanying cartoon, which was in incredibly poor taste, to put it mildly.

Ms. Bindel has not changed her views. She has been quoted as saying that “sex change surgery is unnecessary mutilation”. Tell that to all the people who are now living fulsome happy lives, post re-assignment surgery. Even last week, whilst she was shamelessly attempting to peddle Gaze Review in a Guardian Column, she queried in a barely veiled remark whether there was such a thing as a Transgender Community – which I will come to shortly. Do not be fooled by Julie Bindel. She has not changed her views or her invective toward the Transgender Community.

READ FULL ARTICLE Read More

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 333 other followers

%d bloggers like this: