Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for October, 2009

I am going to be a little controversial (just for a change) and talk about the taboo subject of hierarchy and class. This is an accusation aimed at those of us who speak out for sex worker rights. It is also a claim made by some sex workers in order to dismiss other sex workers whom they consider elitist or politically wrong….ERM No. Hierarchy and class is part of life and it is up to us as individuals to make the institutions that try and control us work for us. It is also important to remember that sex workers are true social revolutionaries.

It is fashionable among some sex worker activism to dismiss talk of class among sex workers as elitist because they claim that it is divisive and unhelpful in the battle for rights. This refusal to publicly acknowledge social diversity with in our industry makes the question of hierarchies a controversial issue for discussion. This reluctance is partly because the opponents of prostitution deliberately confuse the negative experiences of some street workers and trafficked and migrant workers as the experiences of all sex workers. This is a disingenuous but effective trap that we as activists can fall into because we fear that any emphasis on categories with in our work will be understood as divisions and thus negative to certain sectors of sex worker’s experiences that are less able to communicate.
There is a danger that sex worker activists can become complicit in maintaining the idea of the sex worker as a victim reacting to circumstance rather than presenting sex work as a reflection of the society in which it operates. Thus activists feel obliged to emphasise similarities with in our shared experiences of sex work which is a laudable attitude to take but If we are to engage the industry, the public and the media in understanding the complex nature of our industry then I would argue that we have to publicly acknowledge hierarchy and explain the role it plays in our relationship to each other as sex workers and how hierarchy affects the way the media and public relate to us. In simplistic terms we have to be honest about our differences and not be afraid to communicate the complexities of individual choices and experiences. Social and geographic mobility is one of many important aspects of sex work that is ignored and reporting on the positive and negative aspects of hierarchy with in indigenous cultures is especially important in fighting the stereotype of victim.

It is often easier when engaging the media and government to identify as victims escaping poverty rather than to enter a discussion that suggests that sex work is only one of many choices available to a very diverse group all of whom have very different experiences and reasons for becoming sex workers. Ignoring the diversity of those experiences is as limiting and as damaging as supporting by silence the anti sex work rhetoric that the experience of the victim is true of all sex workers. We live in a media age where the extremes with in any profession will get the heads lines and so will dominate any discussion on that profession. It is important that as activists we emphasise that such simplification of complex issues in relation to sex work are an abstraction of our work rather than a reflection.
Those sex work activists who dismiss talk of hierarchy with in sex work because of political allegiance must be aware that negative perceptions exist that their social and literary skills may be taken to suggest privilege and inverted snobbery which may be in the long run more damaging than actually discussing and presenting our industry warts and all as it is. All of us who support and speak on sex workers rights have to be careful not to allow our enemies to negate the excellent work we do by being ultra defensive in our reactions to accusations of elitism with in sex work.
Sex work reflects the society in which is operates. It is not separate from society. Sex workers are often the most mobile members with in society not least because the nature of the work and the financial rewards can facilitate a social and geographic mobility that few others careers can. Some sex workers are therefore able to climb the social ladder if they choose from street worker to high class escort and of course it can go the opposite way. We all find our working comfort level and then develop the skills required to work in that chosen environment. Acknowledging this fact of life is not being elitists but recognising the diverse nature of our work and of the society in which we operate. Every society has different rules and structures often historical that determine differently how sex work exists with in that society and the rules with in which it operates. This makes a mockery of some abolitionists who arrive with a preconceived notion of sex work based on western prejudices and colonial, imperialist attitudes; especially in the developing world, that they have arrived to save the ignorant natives from themselves. Hierarchies and social class distinctions exist in myriad forms even with in distinct sectors of sex worker communities including escorting, street work and the indoor market. Recognising this fact is not a betrayal of our common identity but rather a realisation of our shared experiences, we should not be ashamed to celebrate our diversity and our social legacy.

Sex workers are perhaps one of the most socially diverse groups of workers that you will ever meet which makes us unique. Historically we have a heritage that includes high class courtesans who led fashionable society from glamorous salons that attracted the leading minds of society to penny whores who stalked the London stews.
Many of the most aristocratic families owe their positions and wealth to the bed room skills of some distant relative who caught the attention of a king or Queen and like wise many a poor family survived because one entrepreneurial member chose to use their body to live. Today the international nature of the labour market is recognised in the sex industry although often it is conveniently confused with trafficking by moralists and anti sex work campaigners. The truth is that sex sells and always will what ever the moral or political climate.

The one thing we all have in common is that sex, whither on a street corner or between Yves Delorme sheets, does not change. A fuck is a fuck and a blow job is a blow job. That is the common denominator that links us all in this work and we should not forget that regardless of where we work or the nuances of the culture in which we work or the hierarchical structures in which we operate our job is universally similar in its basics. Accusations of elitism and snobbery directed at us by predominantly middle class moralists who objectify all whores as victims are the worst snobs because they endanger the lives and liberty of every sex worker and that again unites us all against the common enemy, prejudice and ignorance about our work.

Read Full Post »

This piece was sent to me by a client who asked that it be published to explain a little from the clients perspective on why he and others use the services of sex workers. In the present climate it is fashionable for clients to be demonised by some feminists and some areas of government and the media. I think this article gives a little insight into the world of clients and goes a little way to redress the image of the client as abuser.

Douglas.

I have written this article to explain why I use the services of sex workers. Everyone has different reasons of course but this is mine and I am sure my experiences are very similar to those of other clients.

Elrond……..

I am writing this article to explain why I started and continue to use the services of sex workers. To help understand the context I provide some brief biographical information..
Men visit sex workers for all kind of reasons, lack of sexual partners, lack of opportunity to meet others outside of work, shyness, feelings of inadequacy, the need for new experiences, to act out fantasies and disability. This article is a description of my own personal reasons and experiences of visiting sex workers, and should in no way be seen to apply to other clients in commercial sex.
First lets say a little bit about myself. I am 55, happily married with a grown up family who have left home. At home I still have a good sex life, making love several times a week to my wife, and more when the stress of work does not interfere, for instance when we are away on holiday. I had been monogamous all my life, only ever having sex with my one and only partner. I have worked in the computer industry all my life, mainly in the office but occasionally visiting clients for the day, and some times travelling abroad.
My work changed six years ago, when I became a consultant, and was spending the whole week out of the office on customer sites. In particular I found myself working almost full time for five years in one major city of Britain away from home. After six months of this, and most of my colleagues were going onto other projects, a feeling of boredom and lack of social company pervaded my life.
It was at this point I took the plunge into commercial sex. Looking back there were several reasons, boredom, no one to talk to in the evenings, the opportunity and a tremendous feeling of curiosity. Had I been missing something all my life, would the experience of sexual intercourse with another women be different. I had reached the age of 50 (mid life crisis time) and felt I really should try something different before it was too late. Once I had started thinking about sex with another women, the thought became more and more compelling.
Where I was working it was fairly easy to gain access to commercial sex, there were a multitude of saunas in that city, and at the time the women working in them were reviewed on Punternet. Yes I knew about Punternet, a colleague had shown several of us the website several years before. Access to commercial sex was then very easy whilst working in that city. I won’t go into details of the experience, other than to say it was a kind of out of body experience. I felt I was looking down on my self while I made love to this gorgeous German girl. The memory of this first time is still as strong today
For a long time I settled into a routine, once a week visit to the Sauna, and then onto to have dinner and a drink before finishing in a music bar. The Sauna part became a very important event of the week. It was not just about the sex (which was important and tremendously enjoyable and varied as you would expect from a professional), but also the company of many women and clients for a couple of hours. Yes it filled in a period of time where I could get to chat and listen to the life experiences of the sex workers and the clients. Yes a relationship did build up between us and we could talk about most things, which I would be embarrassed to talk about to anyone else. I remember one woman saying she felt more like a councillor than a sex worker with many of her clients. The few years I worked in that city made me understand more about human relationships, sex and love than all of the previous years of my life. Those days are now an important part of my life.
I talk as if commercial sex is now no longer part of my life. That is not the case. I still am in the market for commercial sex, and wherever I travel I look for someone to spend some time with. Now it tends to be Independents Escorts. This is partly because I cannot recreate the Sauna scene of that major city, where women and their clients would sit and chat before we each choose our partner and disappeared into the private rooms. Instead now I am sat in an anonymous room and shown one woman after another, or I check from a menu and decide whom to spend some time with. In these brothels I don’t get to build that relationship I yearn for, or have the opportunity to fill in an evening with laughter.
The Independent Escort is someone I can build a relationship with, through the Internet before the meeting, someone I can maybe take for dinner, and someone I can meet several times. One prime example of this would be in another city where I met the same women several times, sometimes for sex, sometimes just for dinner and mostly for both. We both became quite well related to each other, would try different things in bed, and visit different restaurants, and different pubs, learning from each other.
This year I had several day liaison with this women, when I bought her a ticket to Glastonbury so we could share a festival together under canvas. The thought occurred last year, and I bought the tickets in January. Making a booking so long ahead requires commitment and trust on both sides of the bargain. It was very romantic and exciting for both of us, not the normal words most people would expect to use in commercial sex. Why did I do this? I wanted to go to Glastonbury, it was something my partner would not enjoy, and I needed someone to share the experience with. Needless to say the escort was pleased to go, she had always wanted to go to Glastonbury. From our previous times together we had discussed the types of music we each enjoyed. There were similarities and differences in our likes. The whole shared experience became more enjoyable than if we had each gone on our own, each of us adding our own personality to the festival. I saw parts of the festival I would not have gone to if left to my own devices, and would have been poorer for it. Since then we have shared our pictures and thoughts about the festival.
To summarise, my first reasons to buy sex was very much because I felt I was missing out on some of the enjoyment of sex. Most of my sex at home was very much run of the mill, enjoyable but no little kinks like a bit of Tie and Tease. No oral sex either receiving or giving, no parties, no threesomes. In commercial sex I have been a seeker of variety, from 20 year olds through to women in their late 50’s. I have been looking for different experiences, group sex, water sports, anal, mild domination and I am still experimenting.
I have continued because the sex with professionals who know what they are doing is very enjoyable, there are still aspects I want to explore. I continue because I have found some well-motivated and astute women, and some very intelligent and articulate women who I want to get to know better and share time with. Yes I will be taking another women to another different festival next year. Tickets have already been purchased and dates set in our diaries.
The final point though with commercial sex, is at the end of the day, you can turn around and walk out of that door, and there will be no come back from your temporary partner. Having an affair with a non-commercial sex worker would lead to complications where the partner could become attached to you. In the main the transaction is anonymous and both of you have something to lose if the liaison became public.
Commercial sex has allowed me to build up many friendships over the course of years. Even friends I have made through the net in cities I have not yet visited. I feel now I can visit almost anywhere in the UK, and there would be someone I could call upon who would fill an otherwise uninteresting evening with humour, laughter and Julie Bindel forbid, some sex. At the end of the day what is wrong in leaving a little present in cash in appreciation of the time that has been set-aside for you. We all like giving gifts to others we appreciate.

Read Full Post »

So, the news hits the stands, the sharks start circling, the debate reaches boiling point and everyone gets out their weapons and takes aim! Dramatic? hell yeah….but that’s nothing new.


Trafficking sells newspapers, sells art, sells righteousness and sells a number of sex workers down the river to desperate measures by ignoring the voices of those who demand equal rights to harm reduction, legislation that protects them and the right to choose how to work as safely as anyone else.

Yesterday’s Guardian newspaper ran a front page headline asserting that a six month police operation in the UK had failed to find one single trafficked woman involved in UK sex work throughout this period. Not one. Now forgive me but even I find this hard to believe, because I’m a sex work activist who also acknowledges the darker side of sex work, but that said I was dancing when I read this article, whooping for joy that finally, someone somewhere in British journalism, ESPECIALLY in the Guardian, that pretty little nesting place of our beloved Julie Bindel (gasp! you mean she may be….shock horror….mistaken about all of these ‘victims’ out there ?!!) would print this news. Read the article here.

I then discovered a page of responses, hardly surprising, in the next days ‘debate and comments’ section of the same newspaper arguing that to ‘discredit’ this operation was damaging and short sighted. Read some of those responses here and here

Today’s Guardian sees the debate continue with this letter, and from some who were perhaps ahead of the game you can find an article by Belinda Brooks-Gordon which was published earlier this year posing the same questions.


As far as I can tell, the debate rages on, always has done and always will do, for it is as long as the history of prostitution and as long as the history of the birth of a morally defined democracy in our country. I’m not suggesting prostitution doesn’t exist in non-democratic countries of course, though the risks to those who buy and sell sex in such countries may be even further compounded by gender restrictions imposed according to religion and culture, more that I sometimes wonder why those who campaign so vociferously against prostitution and sex work want so badly to enforce their views upon those of us who don’t agree with them. Frustratingly, and all too often, uncorroborated and unreferenced ‘research’ figures and statistics are pulled out of nowhere to back up the claims that all sex work is bad because of the ‘thousands’ of women who are trafficked and the teeny tiny 2% of us who choose this work.

The way I see it is this (and I’ll duck here to avoid the ensuing shitstorm), it’s a bit like the BBC giving the BNP’s Nick Griffin a platform. If, and I reiterate the word if, you are going to frame your arguments with outrageous claims not based in real evidence and far removed from many people’s experiences of the world, then you can expect to leave the building with egg on your face. If you are going to make grand sweeping generalisations that don’t ring true, and that can be proven to be based in falsehood, then you can expect to be discredited. Reactionary politics, however they are dressed are exactly that…reactionary and you do yourself a disservice in limiting the amount of real support you can offer to those who do need it.

As a long time sex work activist and advocate, I’m tired of polarised debate around this. I know and accept that there are problems in sex work. I know and accept there are women who are forced into this work, trafficked into this work, who would choose to do something else if they could BUT there are women and men who choose it too, besides that is this just another red herring? CONSENT is the key and is more significant in framing this debate than the problematic concept of ‘choice’. Global politics, gender politics, socialism, sexual politics, they all play a part but f**k me guys, some of us like sex, some of us would rather sell sex than hamburgers or arms, or oil or fast cars. Some of us would rather a blow job than no job, some of us would rather suck cock than kiss ass, but when we’re doing it, we’d like to be safe, to be entitled to the same rights to protection from rape, violence and exploitation as anyone else in any other job and the right to healthy working practices. Polarising the debate just keeps this from happening over and over and actually does more damage than anything to both the protection of those for whom it advocates and most definitely to the rest of us who are left dangling in the pond of ‘evil nasty harlots’ who haven’t yet seen the error of our ways.

Jeez….wake up would you! I would want a genuinely trafficked, coerced woman or man to get as much support as she or he asked for or needed but I don’t want that support to come with blood on it’s hands as it does when the debate ignores the safety of many in favour of the moral values of a few. Let’s get this nailed people and start listening to the voices of those who do the work in making policies that impact directly upon them. Consultation is the new black!

Rant over!

You have been listening to Claudia Bites.

Read Full Post »

A Theory.

Why Criminalizing Sex Work Won’t Work…

Now granted, this is just one woman’s, one sex worker’s, theory on the whole ball of wax, but let me lay it out for you:

I firmly believe that criminalizing sex work will not work for one very simple reason: I live in the United States.

Let me elaborate for you. Come on, kick back, smoke if you got ‘em, and let me wax epic with some theory here. You see, in 48 of the 50 United States, prostitution is illegal. Rhode Island has a loophole in the law which allows for indoor prostitution (though that law is currently under fire) and about half the counties in the state of Nevada have legal prostitution (a system which is wrought with its own problems). In the rest of the USA, prostitution is illegal on all fronts: it is illegal to sell sex and illegal to buy it. Be that as it may… There is still a whole lot of selling of sex going on here on my side of the pond, y’all.

Where I live it is illegal, and I am in a pretty conservative state. However, that said, it would take me no time at all, were I of the mind to do so, to hire a sex worker. I could find one from an agency add, I could find one online, I could get in my car, drive a few blocks, and find one working on 14th street in our Nation’s Capitol- even though the weather right now is horrible. I could find one in a bar, a club, a massage parlor, a strip joint. If I wanted to, even though it is illegal here, I could find a sex worker in no time at all. Even though it is illegal here, all around, for everyone involved, people are still buying and selling sex all day, every day, 365 days a year, hell, even on Christmas! The fact that it is illegal has done nothing whatsoever to stop people from buying and selling sex. Nothing. Nada. Zip. Zero. It has not cut down on the supply, it has not cut down on the demand, all it has done is make life for sex workers a huge pain in the ass and a hell of a lot more complicated. And why yes, I do know that the popular plans these days revolve around criminalizing the activity for men, the patrons, but not the sex workers themselves. Uh huh. It being criminalized for men/patrons over here sure has ended/ cut down on prostitution! I mean fear of the law and fines and public embarrassment have sure stopped clients from hiring prostitutes over here, right? Um, no. Not at all. If anything, when the law does come down hard on prostitution over here, one of four things happens:

The sex workers and clients move to a new less stringent area.

Guys who are into the danger and the risk of the whole thing, or who do not fear the law at all (read here, are more likely to be violent assholes) do the buying in said areas.

The workers who are most at risk (i.e. survival level workers) will engage in more dangerous activities with riskier clientele to make money.

Sex Work will take place in more underground areas where danger is far more prevalent.

Helpful, no? And always, with these wonderful plans, it is the survival level sex workers, the ones people are trying to help, that take it in the chops. Here, they get arrested, have to engage in more sex acts with less protection to make money, get harassed by police, basically all the bad things that can happen to sex workers plus the added bonus of the activity being a criminal one for them. In plans like the oh so popular Nordic models, well, take away the criminal aspect, leave everything else…oh yeah, and there reports that say the Nordic models which boast about low trafficking rates can do so because any foreign national caught selling sex is pressured to either testify against the client or is deported. Does anyone want to hazard a guess as to what happens to a trafficking victim who is deported back to his or her home country? While still owing a perceived debt to a trafficker or being perceived as property of a trafficker? Often, they are just trafficked somewhere else, if they are lucky. If they aren’t lucky, well, gee, they can end up raped and murdered to set an example. Nice, eh?

Point is, folks, I live somewhere that has made the exchange of sex for money illegal. Yet people still exchange sex for money in droves every day, all over the place, and the law or fear of laws has done little to change that. It has not decreased demand in the least. It has stopped nothing: Not trafficking, not drug use, not abuse, nothing. Right now, as I type, tons of people, from the high end escort with the Escalade to the fourteen year old runaway working a shitty ass corner are out there selling sex for money, and people are still buying even though it is illegal. Making it so has changed nothing. The USA is living proof of that.

Read Full Post »

Coming Out


Many years ago I travelled to Japan and accidently became a hostess. Not so many years ago I went back to Japan to be a hostess again, arriving this time in a dimmer Tokyo picking up the dregs of a recession and the slashing of the expense accounts that had fed me a few years earlier. I wasn’t going to get rich hostessing this time around.
After being fired by two clubs for not getting enough dohans, and then suffering through three weeks at one of the worst clubs on the block–-run by a megalomaniac ex-boy band manager and a mama who made us wear her old dresses then accused us of tearing them because we were all so fat –I did the sensible thing and started at a strip club instead.

I though this was pretty interesting: me working at a strip club, who would have thought? I couldn’t wait to email my friends back in the UK with the news. I was pretty gutted by the reaction.
Talking about stripping lost me friends, set me up for derision, concern, and anger that I was selling out women. Stripping hurts all of us, I was told.

There is much to say about coming out as a stripper, but in my case what intrigues me is the comparison to the disclosure of my first foray into nightwork/sex work/adult entertainment, whatever you want to call it (I like the Japanese term mizu-shobai—“water trade”–its fits me because that’s where I got my feet wet.)

The first time I went to Japan and got a job as a hostess my stories were received with fascination, excitement and questions from my friends about how they could get such a job. Huge contrast to how the same people reacted when I told them I was a stripper. Now of course hostessing and stripping occupy quite different places within the sex industry. You might say that hostessing barely belongs there at all in that there is no inherent nudity or real/simulated sex involved. However the basis of my friends’ concerns (whose innocent minds didn’t know about lap dances–they thought that stripping just meant prancing around topless) seemed to be that I was setting women back by catering to men…and so on… Much of their concern could have equally been directed at my hostessing years before, but it wasn’t.

Example: In the strip club I undress for customers who don’t have to go through the standard courtship. Regardless of any lack of social graces, or hygiene, all they have to do is pull their wallet out.
In the hostess club a customer asks for me–through the request system (shimei)–or I am told by a manager–through the rotation system–to sit with him and drink together. I do so and it is expected that I will not refuse, no matter how rude or repulsive he may be.
Which is what ultimately convinced me to stay at the strip club and not go back to the hostess bar. In the strip club I worked for myself, the club did not give me an hourly wage and so was not in the position to tell me whom to sit with. If a customer was rude to me I was allowed to walk away; in the hostess bar I was expected to grin through any comments a customer might make, no matter how rude or offensive. “You’re too fat”, “your tits are too small” are remarks that I would respond to with a cuss, hair-flip and spin on the heel in a strip club—in the hostess club they were tolerated, and standard. Similarly in the hostess club if a customer made a lunge for my boobs my response was supposed to be to playfully hold his hands and gently tell him what a “naughty boy” he’d been. Similar behaviour, depending on the usefulness of the bouncers, got him thrown out of the strip club. Or I might have just slapped him—the hostess club would have fired me for that.

When I asked my friends why they were opposed so strongly to stripping they protested that I was letting women down. That this was never a concern when I was a hostess makes me wonder if there is something inherent in the nudity that plays into the hands of our enemy. If I had kept my clothes on would it have been OK?

But all that’s not the point, I’m not saying that one job was better than the other—in some ways I liked them both. What I meant to talk about was the delicate line you have to toe when you are talking about your work.
When I started stripping I had never really heard of sex worker’s rights or sex-positive feminism. I wish I had because I could have used the support of a community, at least to know that there were others out there like me. The message I got was that it was all wrong. So I shut up. I felt marooned, over the edge of what was acceptable. So I just kept quiet and hoped no one would find out. But it is in this silence where dishonesty breeds. If we can’t tell our stories then no one gets anywhere closer to understanding—the stereotypes just continue along unchecked.

Then there’s my own dishonesty. When I did speak up I felt like I had to pick a side and stay on it–I had to defend stripping against popular opinion. To my friends I was the spokesperson for the industry so I wanted to paint as pretty a picture as possible. My true feelings are a lot more ambiguous than that—there are a lot of shitty things about stripping, but I didn’t want to mention them so not to give the ‘other side’ leverage.

I remember one customer sneering that all the strippers at his club traveled miles from their hometowns to work there “they’re not exactly proud of their jobs” he said. I wanted to scream at him: “No it’s you that does this to us. You force your stigma onto us and tell us that we should be ashamed to be strippers. You silence us and then take our silence as proof of the shame we should feel for working in the sex industry.”
My silence wasn’t shame. I’m not ashamed. I don’t know if I would say that I am proud to have been a stripper, I’ve never been particularly proud of any job I’ve ever had. What I am proud of though is making the best out of what I had–on my own and on my own terms. For that I can say I am proud. I wish I could say it louder.

Read Full Post »

Last year a piece of my writing was included in the syllabus of a course at the University of Rhode Island called Human Trafficking and Contemporary Slavery. Mine appears to be the only reading not taking an avidly ‘anti-trafficking’ stance. The goals for learning about the week’s topic, Analyses of Sex Trafficking & Prostitution, are ‘Read different analyses and perspectives on sex trafficking and prostitution from different philosophical and analytical perspectives: Christian, feminist, psychological, and economic migrant workers rights.’ This sounds good, but here is the list of readings:
Enslaved in America, Tina Frundt
A Christian Perspective on Sexual Trafficking, Lisa Thompson
Prostitution and Male Supremacy: A Feminist Analysis, Andrea Dworkin
Working in the European Sex Industry: Migrant Possibilities, Laura Agustín
The Swedish Law that Prohibits the Purchase of Sexual Services, Gunilla Ekberg
Survivors of Trafficking and Prostitution Manifesto
Not Sex Work

I believe all the other pieces are fundamentally against prostitution per se and against the idea of sex work as work ever. In that case, students are not getting a rounded view of the varying ways to think about the issues. My piece is anthropological, an exposition of what I’d learned through spending years hanging out/doing research with migrants who sell sex. I wrote it at the request of the editor of a Madrid migration journal who asked for an article about migrants who sell sex that would be free of moralising. I agreed without for a moment imagining the enormous conflict that would arise when I turned in what to me seemed to be a harmless, purely descriptive piece.

The drama began when a well-known Madrid feminist-bureaucrat found out about the imminent publication and demanded my piece be removed – overt censorship. The editor refused. Delays ensued. The conflict rose in the social-services hierarchy until it reached the councillor at the top, who passed my article to her advisers, who gave it the okay. Several months late, in June 2000, the issue appeared with my piece included. The censoring femocrat was outraged and I became famous, or notorious, depending on your point of view, going on to learn from this experience what ‘rescuing’ was about (see Sex at the Margins: Migration, Labour Markets and the Rescue Industry, Zed Books). Here it is in my own less-than-wonderful translation into English.

Working in the European Sex Industry: Migrant Possibilities

Laura Agustín

Translated from the original ‘Trabajar en la industria del sexo’, in OFRIM/Suplementos, June 2000. If you read Spanish, read the original, it’s better.

Migrants who come to work in the European sex industry are of every class, colour, age, ethnicity and nationality, and they are not only women but men and transgender people as well. [1] They arrive via uncountable routes—alone, with friends, in couples or in accompanied groups. Some have money to spend, others arrive indebted. Their documentation may be true or false; some arrive with tourist visas. Many of these people have planned their trips personally over a long time, while others have been presented with an opportunity with little time for planning. Some of these potential travellers had already worked in prostitution in their own country. The great majority, agree sources from all over the world, have understood that their future work will either be prostitution directly or will have a sexual aspect. That is, they have opted for doing sex work.

Before going on I would like to point out that the subject of this essay is not to try to explain why prostitution exists, looking for its causes; nor is it define or judge it within any theoretical framework such as feminism, postmodernism etc. Nor am I going to identify which groups or individuals are found more in this industry and how the involved migratory networks function. Above all I will not be dealing with the question of whether any human being can really ‘choose’ how he works, whether in prostitution or anything else.

I begin with the fact that many migrants doing sexual jobs do not describe themselves as ‘forced’ or without other options in life. They may have fewer options or fewer agreeable options than other people, but they have them. It is also important to point out that among those who suffer from poverty, bad marriages and the entire array of possible causing factors, not all opt for sex work, as not all opt to migrate. No type of determinism can explain completely the human phenomenon of choice. Every choice is intervened by questions of class, gender, ethnicity, economic level and the social conditions at the moment in their country (war, dictatorship, famine, violence, unemployment etc.

Migrants act inside these geopolitical and economic structures and dynamics. The ‘underdeveloped’ countries suffer from the well-known policy of ‘structural adjustment’ imposed by the International Monetary Fund. The feminisation of poverty and migrations exists. Moreover, opportunities seem to be diminishing all the time, even for people with university degrees. However, within all this, migrants take actions and decisions motivated by the desire to live better. These are life-decisions they take when they uproot themselves from their homes, considering themselves brave and adventuresome, including when the future implies sex work.

While the majority of sex workers is female, increasingly they are men, transgenders and boy and girl children. Sexual services are desire also by women and transgenders, and not only by men. In an industry characterised by its ambiguities, it is better not to perpetuate the classical assumption of woman-prostitute/man-client. I will speak in neutral terms whenever possible.

Migrants more than once

These migrants play a transnational role within globalisation processes. Studies of migrations between, for example, the Caribbean and the ‘first world’ describe the powerful mentality of transnational migrants: the conviction of a Jamaican of the 1950s that London was his ‘capital’’ the effort that migrants from Nevis make to conserve the island as their ‘country’ though they live in Brooklyn; the great capacity to exist in two places at once of ‘dominican yorks’ (Hall, Fog Olwig, Guarnizo and others). Businesses engaged in charter flights, messenger services, long-distance phone calls, Internet and electronic transfers of money have much to tell us about these phenomena.

The fact of having a job in the sex industry does not take his transnational role away from a migrant. Moreover, migrant prostitutes are a special phenomenon: It is normal for them not to settle in one place to live. They continue migrating, or, rather, they continue travelling. The sex worker you encounter today in Madrid you may find tomorrow in Paris, next month in Amsterdam and a year later in Spain again. And this is not solely the result of efforts to avoid police controls; there exists a culture in which people want to get to know Europe and which people have their preferred places. Although they are often poor and illegal, many travel in a cosmopolitan fashion.

The European press almost always presents the subject of these trips in terms of deceived victims. In this essay the subject is those who have chosen, inside their possibilities, por a trip ‘arranged’ for a Some have chosen arranged jobs also; they have actively searched for opportunities in their home countries. There are those who have searched for them as well, to sell them trips and jobs in Europe: in this group are agents (known by a variety of names, from empresarios and travel agents to coyotes, snakeheads, and tourist boy- and girl-friends who have met them during their vacations, as well as family members and friends. When these travellers feel deceived, it is usual for them to complain of the labour conditions they have to accept at their destination. Frequently they have signed a contract without understanding the extensive surveillance and little liberty that it implies. That is, someone who is familiar with a few kinds of prostitution in his own country (for example, dancing with clients in a bar and having sex with two or three in one night cannot know beforehand how he is going to feel standing nude in a window in Amsterdam for twelve or fourteen hours a day, or standing next to a road in the Casa de Campo in Madrid). These are forms of prostitution which can be described as ‘industrial’. [2]

We are already talking of prostitution as work.[3] What does this work consist of? First it is necessary to ask: Which?

The market for sex

A large sex industry exists in Europe. This term includes brothels, some clubs, bars, discotheques and cabarets, erotic telephone lines, virtual sex via the Internet, sex shops with private cabins, many massage parlours, saunas and other places for the development of ‘physical well-being, escort services, some matrimonial agencies, many hotels, pensions and flats, commercial and semi-commercial announcements in newspapers and magazines and in small forms to leave or put up (like postcards), pornographic cinemas and rental videos, erotic restaurants, services of domination and submission and street prostitution: an immense proliferation of possible ways to pay for a sexual or sensual experience. [4] It should be clear, then, that what exists is not ‘Prostitution’ but a great variety of different sex jobs.

The word prostitution may impede our understanding that there is a sex market, distract us from the demand—that is, the diverse desires of those who are looking for sexual services. A few years ago, an article in El Mundo, a Madrid newspaper, was called “Un millón de hombres al día va de prostitutas” (“A million men a day visit prostitutes”); it was speaking only of Spain. (Hernández Velasco 1996). This number surely did not attempt to include alll the forms mentioned above within the sex industry. Though no one can ever know the total and correct numbers, this one is impressive. It must be remembered that they will not be the same men who go every day: there will be those who go once a week and others more or less, with a total much larger every year who look for sexual services in Spain. And they look for different services, because they are people of every kind, age, economic level, ethnicity, region and taste. Migrants are clients, also. Clients are homosexuals, transvestites, transsexuals and women, also.

This means there are many and diverse opportunities to work in this industry. For migrants who find their other options disagreeable, difficult or badly paid (cleaning, domestic service, caring for old or sick people or children), finding a place in the sex industry may turn out to be worthwhile. Since often their papers are not all on the up-and-up, or since their work permits (for example, as a domestic) may be based on falsified documents, working in a world full of irregularites may not appear too risky. Those that come looking for a better life in Europe may have to begin in a situation in which they do not feel comfortable; as with all jobs, the first year is the most disconcerting. In this case, what often matters is not leaving the industry but changing for a different situation inside it.

If we look at the description of what constitutes the industry, we find possible jobs as a telephone worker, in which the client is not even seen. Or as a striptease artist, which in many places involves dancing nude and nothing more. Even if we talk about ‘full sex’, it isn’t the same doing it for a pornographic film as in a brothel (or, for example, with clients of sexologists. Obviously, they are different jobs, some carried out in bars, others in houses, offices or examination rooms. In some the worker controls the situation and the hours more; in others he lacks control. Some are well paid, others not. Some services seem easy to perform to some people, while to others they seem difficult. The boss or owner of the place may be the most important element in some jobs. In short, everything depends on the specific situation.

It’s the same if we look at the many forms of physical/sexual contact, of serving the client. [5] Obviously, performing oral sex on a client in a car or in an alley in the rain is not the same as spending a shift inside a club with heating, where you talk and have drinks as well as sex with clients. We can however point out some necessary abilities for carrying out these jobs well, that is, in the most efficient and less problematic manner. In general terms:

• The essence of the work is giving pleasure to others. The worker who doesn’t want to or can’t do this, no matter how good-looking, will fail. The client wants to feel some kind of pleasure.

• As in other service work, the ability to relate to others is very important. To know how to listen ‘actively’, negotiate, encourage, read the body language of the other, sense what is not said and the psychology of the other. To judge when the other is not all right (and not to confuse this with physical appearance). Capacity to smooth situations and calm violent people, confronting or manipulating them. Also necessary for those who work over the telephone.

• Ability to relate to and come to appreciate people from other cultures or ethnic groups or with values different from one’s own. Diplomacy. Clients may be rejected, but income is lost. Being able to imagine the situation of the other, as much through what he wants to hide as through what he reveals. Understanding more than one language.

• Knowing oneself well is extremely important in sex work. Knowing how to use the body sexually and how to take care of oneself, minimising infections, strains and exhaustion, whether physical, emotional or spiritual. It’s necessary to know when one is tired or with little desire to work, because states of neglect often lead to danger. Self-esteem is essential.

• The worker needs a lack of shame about bodies. To be able to talk about sex and show sexual things. A good sense of humour helps.

• As with the jobs of nurses and stewardesses, it is essential to give the client the sensation that he really is desired, that giving him pleasure or taking care of him matters. This is also necessary for cultivating a loyal clientele, one that comes back.

• Often the client wants to talk about his life: problems in his marriage, with his children or at his job. He may have lost his wife or need counseling. The ability to satisfy this type of desire or to want to help to resolve the problems of others is part of sex work. Sometimes this kind of attention matters even more than sex to the client.

• Knowing how to put limits, control what happens and protect oneself from excessive demands. Being able to maintain boundaries with client, who may have many emotional needs.

• Knowing how to sell is key, including over the telephone and in written messages (electronic mail, chat, mobile phones). Seduction is an art that few command, which helps explain the high status of courtesans and geishas in the past. Nowadays transsexuals are often most famous for knowing how to seduce.

• For people who work on their own or have a business it is fundamental to know how to manage funds: accounting, taxes and investments. Knowing how to negotiate, decide on prices.

• The ability to manage, organise and oversee a business is necessary in whatever level the worker works. Working freelance can be done successfully only by someone with the self-discipline to evaluate his efforts and manage his time.

• When employed in someone else’s business, workers need the talent of being able to please the boss or owner as well as the client, who often demand contrary things (for example, to the boss it matters that the work is done rapidly, while the client wants more personal attention).

• If one dances or performs, it’s essential to stay in good shape and act with confidence. Knowing how to take advantage of one’s own good points. Knowing how to dress and make up according to the situation.

• Much of sex work is performance: it’s necessary to know how to present oneself, project oneself and play roles. An example: the stereotype exists of ‘passive’ Asian women, so, for an Asian woman, knowing how to play the passive role may be a key talent. If one works in domination or submission, one needs to know how to create scenes, act, involve and convince the client. Knowing how to flirt.

• The client is not necessarily of the same gender or ‘sexual orientation’ that the worker wants for his or her own partner. Thought of another way, the worker’s personal taste does not have to match what he does at work: a lesbian can work with men, a heterosexual with gays, a transsexual with heterosexuals, a homosexual man with women and so on. In the world of the sex industry, flexibility and ambiguity in tastes and desires are the norm; binary visions (like masculinity/feminity or passivity/activity cease to be very useful.

• Since it’s a market, one needs the ability to compete, create new services and change with the times. Inventing new ways to make money, using new technologies and trying to match services to desires.

• Sexual knowledge is fundamental to carrying out the work. Knowing how to stimulate bodies to produce pleasure, delay or precipitate orgasms and judge the sexual capacity of the other. Moreover there are many tricks that make the job easier for the person who knows them: putting condoms on without clients’ knowing, feigning penetration and many others. Often it’s necessary to teach principles of sexual health to improve the client’s experience: masturbatory techniques, self-control or permitting oneself ‘forbidden’ acts. It’s important to point out that not every client is the confident man of the machista stereotype; many feel shy, ashamed or incapable. There are prostitutes who specialise in therapeutic srvices with disabled people. As for education to avoid sexual illnesses, being able to convince clients that they can enjoy sex with condoms is an important talent.

• One can choose the services one wants to offer, whether oral or manual sex or vaginal or anal penetration. Moreover, in times of ‘safer sex’, less ‘classical’ forms are being accepted, such as mutual masturbation.

• Being able to offer massage, reflexology and other therapies offer more possibilities to make money.

• Working in the production of pornography, it’s possible to learn techniques of photography, video, etc.

• If one works via the Internet, one needs knowledge of computers, email, chat, databases and the construction of webpages.

• If one becomes a supervisor or even owner of a sex club or escort agency, one learns to deal with the necessities of the personnel, encouraging them to work well.

The above list (which will never be complete) summarises useful abilities for working in the European sex industry. In other cultures the industry has other facets, so the work may require other abilities. In Japan, for example, there is work as a hostess at bars where groups of men who work in the same company come to spend the evening with their boss. They spend their time talking and joking, with the goal of relaxing with the boss, something which is prohibited inside the company. The woman’s job is to be there, light cigarettes, make sure that glasses are always filled and encourage the men to feel good. For those clients, making sexual commentaries about the women allows them to feel good. Clients do not ask for other services; this is done in another kind of place. (Allison 1994).

In the city of Nairobi during the colonial period (into the 1960s a common form of sex work consisted in a woman setting up a house and offering domestic services to migrants from the countryside. The migrant could request that his clothes be washed and ironed, that food and teas be prepared for him and that the woman slept with him. He could sleep in the house as well. Women charged for each service separately (White 1990). This phenomenon occurs in many parts of the world where there is a masculine migration living in rented rooms without domestic facilities (or they without domestic knowledge. Around them arrive people to sell them domestic and sexual services.

And that’s just the beginning; the possibilities are infinite. Keep in mind that if these forms are not well known in Europe, those that come from other continents do know them. It’s always possibility that they will combine some of these customs with what is usual here in sex jobs. Many times one notices in conversations with prostitutes that concepts of prostitution, or of sex work, or of work itself or of sex do not mean the same to everyone. Often there are confusions when ‘westerners’ seem to see only sex in these jobs, while migrants don’t experience them that way.

Work conditions for migrants

When ‘migrant prostitutes’ are mentioned in Europe it’s automatic to think that their only option is ‘the street’, a stereotype well reinforced by the press with its eternal photos of women talking to men in cars. For personal reasons, some migrants do prefer to do street prostitution. However, many others consider it better to be in clubs, flats or less visible places than the street (or than central bars where they are less exposed to the public gaze. When they are more controlled by entrepreneurs, these also may prefer prostitutes to work inside and in more anonymous places, such as highway clubs. Moreoever, it’s been demonstrated in numerous studies that the street proportion of prostitution isn’t even a fourth of the total.

Another stereotype is thinking that there are only two possibilities: either being free or being semi-enslaved. Instead, there is a wide range of states between the two extremes. Among people who work on their own, some have ‘pimps’ and others no. Many give money to a girl- or boyfriend freely, as many men do to their partners or spouses. There are families who share flats and income and friends who work togethers. There are people under contract to work in clubs who have scarcely any life outside, sometimes they are even moved around from place to place without being consulted. However, some of these go along with this situation because they save more money that way and feel safer. Others are truly trapped. It’s essential to talk about specific situations.

Labour advantages

What labour advantages can sex work offer? First, flexibility: one can work full-time, part-time or occasionally, which makes it convenient to many mothers. It can be a second job. In the case of street prostitution, it is one of the few ways to make money, buy food and take it home the same day; also the place of work may be chosen, either close to or far from home. It is work that can be tried and left if it isn’t liked; if it suits it may be the path to independence. Many sex jobs do not require formal training or education. These are advantages characteristic of the ‘informal sector’ in general, where migrants have the possibility of being beneficiaries as well as natives. Many migrants point out the opportunities that the work offers to ‘see the world’ and meet Europeans; also that they don’t feel as alone as in other jobs.

The usual assumption is that the migrant is going to be in the lowest rung of any industry, but they are found at all levels of the sex industry. Moreover many migrants do have formal training, even university education. If they are students in Europe, the work may be a way to pay their way. As in every job, the worker has more chance to choose, control and move up after being in the business a certain amount of time and finding his preferred level, always depending on his individual capacities. It’s a period of apprenticeship, perhaps of a year.

Migrants may also enjoy some advantages within the industry, where their phenotypes make them more exotic—perhaps more exciting—to some Europeans. If they know how to take advantage of this, it could give them more or better clientele. It’s also possible that migrants have more willingness to work with migrant clients, of their own or other ethnicities. And it’s posible that that willingness gives them a niche within the market, in some times and some places. In the case of transgenders, the fact of having ‘different’ bodies, equipped with organs of both sexes, gives them a clientele that is looking exactly for this ambiguity.

Labour disadvantages

The worst of the labour disadvantages of sex work is its clandestine character. Labour protections do not exist: neither contracts, nor benefits, nor social security nor the unions to demand them. Since the industry isn’t legal in itself, almost everywhere (although the bars, clubs, restaurants, agencies etc are, its workers with few exceptions do not receives some of the most basic social services, such as police protection, even when they are raped, robbed or coerced. In this situation, the boss or owner of the business has the freedom to impose any unjust condition on his employees, and if they protest they may simply be dismissed. It is common for the employees of massage parlours to say that the boss watches over them too much, or that they don’t have the right to reject clients they don’t like. In exotic-dance bars, the complaint is often of overly long shifts with little time to rest.

These commentaries are heard as much among migrants as among natives, with the further aggravation that they are even less likely to lodge a complaint or claim labour rights while they lack basic permission to earn money in Europe. In research carried out in many countries, the most common complaint concerns the abuses of the police, that they carry out raids only to fulfill their necessities to show a certain number of arrests, that they blackmail prostitutes and coerce them into giving sexual services free, that they persecute foreigners, or blacks or transsexuals. Prostitutes complain much more about the police than about clients or ‘pimps’.

It would seem that the worker lives through a process of ‘apprenticeship’ during which he is more exposed to rapes, beatings and robberies; later he has learned to avoid or manage problematic clients. Working in couples, for example an older or more experienced person with a younger, may help during this learning process. However, given the lack of police protection, the possibility of violence from clients always exists.

Another important disadvantage is the difficulty of maintaining a healthy emotional state of mind. Many prostitutes feel guilty of having sinful relations; others describe a great weight on their heart. About the sex itself, many say they ‘don’t feel anything’ when they are with clients, while others feel disgust, fear, loneliness or sadness.[6] Since they enjoy no police protection, they are exposed to all kinds of deceit, confusion, danger and problems. Despite the fact that the worst does not always occur, preserving a positive state of mind is a great challenge.

Ambiguous jobs

Domestic service is considered one of the jobs that can lead to prostitution. Live-in domestics share intimate situations with families who are not their own; they care for children and old or sick people; they have little privacy of their own. They are in the house in the morning, when family members get up, and at night, when they go to bed. Some have sexual relations with someone in the family, through coercion or out of loneliness, love, desire or to obtain advantages, benefits or some extra money. Some domestics also do sex work in another place, as a second source of income. Of course, many domestics have none of these experiences. It’s better not to think that there’s a clear dividing line between domestic service and sexual service. Here exist many ambiguities.

The same is true of matrimonial agencies of the type ‘mail-order brides’. Some arrange conventional marriages; there are people satisfied to have found their spouse this way. At the same time, some agencies use the same techniques to ‘sell’ people to others that sex businesses use. Many women are married fairly straightforwardly to do domestic/sex work, that is, to carry out the role of ‘traditional’ wives, which leads to the common marriage between a ‘first world’ man with a ‘third world’ woman. Authentic disasters happen in these situations‘, but successes occur as well. Many women married through agencies reject the label often given them of ‘poor victims’.

In many studies of prostitutes, evidence demonstrates that there does not always exist a clear line between work and client, on the one hand, and love and lover, on the other. That is, a commercial aspect may coexist with feelings of love or affection. Since this can present as many advantages as disadvantages, I don’t include it in either category. Some workers feel confused, others enjoy the confusion.

With the exception of people who feel they have a ‘vocation’ for sex work, migrants now working in the industry almost always say it’s temporary. Many leave the industry and return later. Whether they like the work of not, the majority don’t identify themselves as prostitutes or sex workers. Again we find ourselves in equivocal situations, in which the desire to ‘get everything clear’ doesn’t get us anywhere. Questions asked to migrant sex workers such as if they like being prostitutes or why don’t they leave prostitution may receive strange answers. It’s possible that they don’t consider themselves prostitutes. Or that, since the situation is temporary, it doesn’t matter so much. Or that when they see pained faces on those asking the questions they prefer to say anything but the truth. Once the questioners have left, someone always comments that when people say one is victimised and miserable as a prostitute one has certainly never had to clean public toilets or had to suffer the sexual harassment that goes along with a lot of domestic work—the jobs supposedly more dignified than prostitution.

For those who can only imagine feeling disgust at doing sex work, it would be a terrible choice. It turns out that this is not the universal reaction; or that ‘disgust’ is only one component or moment among many, some neutral or positive. Looked at that way it’s like every other job in the world.

For those looking for statistics

It isn’t useful to divide this industry by country. If there are still typical characteristics in any particular country, there are many more that are shared among all countries. The European market enjoys high-quality telecommunications and transport networks as well as the incomplete but still extensive policy of ‘open borders’. Everyone agrees that the sex industry has grown impressively, but quantifying it is difficult: What it is that has to be counted, exactly? The income of sex-business owners? The number of people employed in all jobs related to the industry [ie, the person who takes you to the place by taxi, the person who takes care of your car, the person who brings your drink, the person who watches the door, the person who accepts your money, the person who cleans the place]? Shouldn’t one include also those who produce the necessary ‘tools’ of the trade such as clothing, makeup, hair products and wigs, drinks, food, cigarettes and condoms? Any why not then the lawyers who arrange contracts and closings and every kind of permit, the accountants, the doctors who perform check-ups on the employees and those who rent rooms by the hour?

The International Labour Office [ILO] has published statistics on Thailand which indicate that of a total of 104,262 employees in 7,759 establishments where sexual services could be bought, 64,886 people sold these servicios while 39,376 were ‘support personnel’, a term which includes owners, managers and go-betweens/procurers. More than a third of the employees then were not sex workers but they live because of the industry (Lin Lean Lim 1998).

Almost always the intent is to count only the number of sex workers, but this doesn’t give very trustworthy or comparable data either. Given the ‘irregular’, criminalised, undocumented or stigmatised nature of the industry, each project of counting prostitutes has counted a different way. For example, one cannot compare the statistic “23% (412) and 14% (117) of women with visas to work as dancers in Switzerland were from the Dominican Republic and Brazil” (International Office of Migrations with that of “75% of foreign prostitutes in Germany are from Latin America and the Caribbean” (AGISRA—Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gegen Internationale Sexuelle und Rassistische Ausbeutung). One cannot even compare their methods of counting.

A study of the TAMPEP project (Transnational AIDS/STD Prevention Among Migrant Prostitutes in Europe Project) offers statistics on the percentages of migrants among prostitutes in European countries. The numbers are very schematic, since they come from participating projects that have not used the same methodology for counting, that don’t all have the same type of contact with prostitution (many for example know only stsreet workers, or only people who use certain health services, who don’t speak all the languages necessary to communicate with all the migrants or who operate only in big cities. Also, we know that asking a migrant personal details about his life does not assure a true response. On top of all that, since the lifestyle of these migrants is to move a lot, counting them by country is of temporary usefulness.

The statistics of the percentage of migrants among prostitute populations are: 90% in Italy, 25% in Sweden and Norway, 85% in Austria, 62% in the north of Germany and 32% in the south, 68% in Holland and 45% in Belgium. The Spanish number of 50% includes only street prostitution in Madrid (Tampep 1999). Since 1997, when the last study of this kind was done, the percentage of migrants in the sex industry has increased in all European countries.

Labour proposals related to the sex industry

The report published by the ILO in 1998 (The Sex Sector) recommends the inclusion of the sex industry in official government accounting. The ILO believes that the recognition will mean enormous contributions to regional and national economies in terms of taxes and sales of permits, but also that this is the only way to improve the situation of those who are employed as sex workers. If governments recognise the sex sector, they will be obliged to extend labour rights and protections to the people who work in it. In the case of the four countries of the report (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand), the recognition of the sector would improve the lives of between 800,000 and a million people who receive payment for sexual services.

Although the ILO report is based on research in the industry in countries of Southeast Asia, it warns that these, rather than having a worse problem with prostitution, are ‘illustrative’ of a global phenomenon. The ILO’s proposal is highly pragmatic, centred in labour matters. Nowadays, Holland is the country which pays most attention to the matter of ‘legalisation’ of sex businesses, in search of the situation which does least harm to the employees. Holland’s new law permits and regulates the functioning of brothels in the same way as other businesses, with the goals of legalising the organisation of voluntary prostitution and increasing the penalisation of the organisation of involuntary prostitution (via violence, force, coercion or fraud and with minors. Since the law allows the details to be decided by municipalities, there may be differences from place to place. The situation is improving for thousands of sex workers but not for ‘illegal’ migrants, who continue working without labour protections.

Although Germany has a system in which sex workers ‘register’, work legally and pay taxes, they do not receive normal labour benefits such as social security. Germany is now in the process of changing over to a model such as the Dutch, in which prostitution will be recognised as work so that the workers can receive labour rights and equal treatment before the law.

Abolitionist proposals do not have the intention of improving the labour situation of prostitutes. The new Swedish law criminalises the client, tending to push him to seek sexual services in less visible spaces. As happens with police raids, when the business goes into hiding, the worker may run more risks.

Systems of ‘sanitary regulation’ usually concentrate on enforcing medical checkups and tests of the workers, stigmatising them as ‘sources of contagion’ of sexually transmitted diseases. Some regions of Germany still impose frequent checkups. I do not label this proposal as ‘labour’, because it has been clear for two hundred years that the goal of this type of reglamentation is not to care for the health of the worker; on the contrary, it blames him for illnesses that can never be transmitted without the participation of two persons—one of these, the client.

Notes

[1] The term transgender brings together all possibilities among transvestites and transexuals, whose appearances may appear masculine, femenine or ambiguous. The work intergender is also used. Current studies of sexuality avoid classic assumptions: in the case of prostitution the automatic assumption is that they are women.

[2] Sex tourists speak of this difference this way: while in Europe prostitutes value efficiency and speed, in the ‘third world’ they take more time with the client, they give more services and they appear to become more involved. This would be a pre-industrial, perhaps ‘craftsman’ form.

[3] Not as ‘vocation’ or ‘profession’, which might imply more intention.

[4] The terms for these services vary from place to place. Migrants come with their own terms, in various languages, which mix and produce hybrid forms.

[5] There are those who call themselves sexoservidoras (sex-servers, perhaps) en México.

[6] Some people speak of the disgust or sadness they fel when they clean bathrooms or bodies. Many experience ‘emotional’ dangers when they work as live-in maids, living in situation with families who are not their own.

References and some readings that discuss labour aspects of prostitution

Allison, Anne. 1994. Nightwork: Sexuality, Pleasure and Corporate Masculinity in a Tokyo Hostess Club. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Anarfi, John K. 1998. “Migrations and tourism: Ghanaian women and prostitution in Côte d’Ivoire.” In Global Sex Workers, K. Kempadoo y J. Doezema, eds. New York: Routledge.

Anti-Slavery International. 1996. Redefining Prostitution as Sex Work on the International Agenda. London: Anti-Slavery International.

COIN. 1996. La industria del sexo por dentro. Santo Domingo RD: COIN (Centro de Orientación e Investigación Integral).

Delacoste, Frédérique and Alexander, Priscilla, eds. 1987. Sex Work: Writings by Women in the Sex Industry. San Francisco: Cleis Press.

Fog Olwig, Karen. 1993. Global Culture, Island Identity: Continuity and Change in the Afro-Caribbean Community of Nevis. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

Gálvez, T. and Todaro, R. 1985. Yo trabajo así…en casa particular. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones CEM.

Georges, Eugenia. 1990. The Making of a Transnational Community: Migration, Development, and Cultural Change in the Dominican Republic. New York: Columbia University Press.

Grasmuck, Sherri and Pessar, Patricia R. 1991. Between Two Islands: Dominican International Migration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Guarnizo, Luís. 1994. “Los dominicanyorks: The Making of a Binational Society.” In Annals, AAPSS, 533, May.

Hall, Stuart. 1997. “The Local and the Global in Culture.” In Globalization and the World System: Contemporary Conditions for the Representation of Identity, A. King, ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Hanson, Jody. 1998. “Sex Tourism as Work in New Zealand: A Discussion with Kiwi Prostitutes.” En Pacific Rim Tourism, M. Oppermann, ed. Oxon UK: CAB.

Hart, Angie. 1998. Buying and Selling Power: Anthropological Reflections on Prostitution in Spain. Boulder CO: Westview Press.

Hernández Velasco, Irene. 1996. “Un millón de hombres al día va de prostitutas.” El Mundo, 27 December [Sociedad 26].

Kempadoo, Kamala and Doezema, Jo. 1998. Global Sex Workers: Rights, Resistance, and Redefinition. New York: Routledge.

Kulick, Don. 1998. Travesti: Sex, Gender and Culture among Brazilian Transgendered Prostitutes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lin Lean Lim, ed. 1998. The Sex Sector: The Economic and Social Bases of Prostitution in Southeast Asia. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.

McClintock, Anne, ed. 1993. Social Text Winter [37].

Murray, Alison. 1991. No Money, No Honey: A Study of Street Traders and Prostitutes in Jakarta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nowak, Anna. 1999. “Political Transformation in Poland: the Rise of Sex Work.” Research for Sex Work, 2:9-11.[ Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit]

Occupational Health and Safety Code of Practice for the Sexual Services Industry in the ACT (Australia). 1999.

Oppermann, Martin, ed. 1998. Sex Tourism and Prostitution: Aspects of Leisure, Recreation, and Work. Cammeray NSW: Cognizant Communication Corporation.

Pernía, Nury. 1999. “Trabajadoras y Trabajadores Sexuales de Latinoamérica y el Caribe.” Para Working Group on Contemporary Forms of Slavery, Geneva, 21 June.

Prieur, Annick. 1998. Mema’s House, México City: On Transvestites, Queens, and Machos. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Sassen, Saskia. 1998. Globalization and its Discontents. New York: The New Press.

Schifter, Jacobo. 1997. La casa de Lila: un estudio sobre la prostitución masculina. San José CR: ILPES.

Seabrook, Jeremy. 1999. Love in a Different Climate: Men who have sex with men in India. London: Verso.

Sinclair, Thea, ed. 1997. Gender, Work, Tourism. London: Routledge

Skrobanek, Siriporn, Boonpakdee, Nataya and Jantateero, Chutima. 1997. The Traffic in Women: Human Realities of the International Sex Trade. London: Zed Books.

Tabet, Paola. 1989. “I’m the Meat, I’m the Knife: Sexual Service, Migration and Repression in Some African Societies”. In A Vindication of the Rights of Whores G. Pheterson ed. Seattle WN: Seal Press.
TAMPEP. 1999. Health, Migration and SexWork: The Experience of Tampep. Amsterdam: Mr A de Graaf Stichting.

Truong, Thanh-Dam. 1990. Sex, Money and Morality: Prostitution and Tourism in Southeast Asia. London: Zed Books.

White, Luise. 1990. The Comforts of Home: Prostitution in Colonial Nairobi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Read Full Post »

It’s only a Penis

A little thoughtful snippet taken from ideas began in a previous post “A prostitute I am, compassionate am I”. Have a smile and enjoy and I hope it perhaps makes us all think including JB if she pays a visit.

Once the image of the penis was to found every where you looked. You could not move for rampant cocks ejaculating benedictions on a world unashamed of expressing sexual joy. This was our world before monotheism usurped the Goddesses and Gods who inspired civilisation and patriarchy psychologically castrated men banishing the penis as an object of shame to be controlled and humiliated. The penis even in todays liberated times is still too terrifying to be displayed publicly and receiving or giving joy for or to the penis is too often derided as sinful, shameful, naughty, embarrassing or plain criminal.
Radical feminists would have all men socially re educated so that they are ashamed to find joy in their own bodies or worse in the bodies of women. Objectifying men as rapists, potential rapists, abusers and predators, paedophiles or potential paedophiles is a convenient excuse to avoid confronting their own sexual prejudices. This affirms their idea of the right women who agree and wrong women who are yet to be liberated. Inciting governments to create bad law that targets men for simply being sexual and enjoying the joy of sexual fantasy and sexual contact, unless with in prescribed limits that they of course decide, is simply to place a modern twist on the traditional patriarchal control they claim to oppose. What I ask is radical about this? It is simply a reaffirmation of patriarchy that extolled the mortification and denial of the flesh on a promise of life ever lasting after death. Radical feminists far to easily have adopted the role of the new moralists revalorising this dubious old ethic that has caused so much harm to both men and women and which we all must unite against not only for our sakes but for our future generations.

The Radical feminists may not themselves refer to future spiritual rewards for encouraging emotionally and sexually castrated men and women to be shamed into a new totalitarian orthodoxy but they are very comfortable with the company of those who do assume the moral high ground. Radical feminists may prefer to talk of creating a healthy society which recognises sexual equality and no longer objectifies the female form as simply a sexual object, a tool, an orifice for men to both physically and mentally ejaculate into or over. They may talk in these emotive terms but that is not the reality of what they are doing. Instead of embracing the diversity of the human experience of which the sex industry is but one part, they prefer instead to use lurid and derisive stereotypes against any sexual behaviour that does not fit their moral and political tastes. These hyper emotional pronouncements cripple reasoned debate, thus causing fatal distractions from rational resolutions to serious issues.
.
Humanity is ingenious in subverting attempts to normalise us all into one homogenous malleable unit. The sex industry is exemplary in its tenacity for survival in the face of oppression. The reason it does survive and prosper is because it fulfils a human need. Despite our so called liberal society and the sexual revolution of the sixties and seventies there is still a perception of sexual normality with in our society based on an ideal of heterosexual family life. The reality however for many is often very different from expectation and so we find ways of making life work to suit our individual circumstances at any particular time and not least sexually.
Men and women often face a multiple variety of sexual issues with in their lives. For many people coming to terms with gender and orientation, coming to terms with variances of sexual libido either as single people or in relationships, coping with social, mental and physical disabilities are all issues and problems that sex workers service. The list is endless in terms of the variety of areas with in our lives where sex is an issue. Simply learning to be a sexual person and to become a lover are both areas where the expertise of sex workers are ignored. It is wrong that men have become scapegoats for society’s sexual squeamishness and that servicing the penis is too easily confused with objectifying women rather than acknowledging that people have sexual needs that are various and complex and actually normal.

Accepting that the sex industry has a role to play in a healthy society is not to accept injustice or to turn a blind eye to areas with in the sex industry that infringes on acceptable behaviour or encourages abuse and discrimination. These however are issues with in society in general and common to all areas where the public is engaged for gain either financial or political.
What we must do is to accept that the human rights of sex workers and of our clients and consumers are recognised and that the abuses with in the sex industry that are often the result of laws that disenfranchise and stigmatise and criminalise should not be used as an excuse to deny us our rights and our dignity and the respect we deserve.

So let us rediscover the joy of the penis and receive its ejaculations of benedictions with out fear or prejudice and understand that it has needs that fulfilled will lead to a more harmonious and happy society. Let us stop being afraid of sex and the human body both male and female and as a society truly have a sexual revolution.

Smile it’s only a penis.

Read Full Post »

I’ve seen this report around a bit lately, by Suzanne Jenkins, from Law at Keele University in the Midlands of the UK.

Now, I want to focus specifically on the trans aspect of the report, because it’s here that it seems most problematic.

Let’s begin with definitions. There’s (cissexual) women, (cissexual) men, and transsexual (women). This is a problem from the start, if you’re beginning from the cissexist position that trans women are some mystic third gender of our own. We’re not, we’re women. It wouldn’t have been very hard to write “cis women” “cis men” “trans women” in all those pretty graphs, or even just “transsexual women”–it’s not a good start if you begin by disrespecting the gender identity of those you’re purporting to study (and presumably help?)..

Further, given this semantic problem, and given general cissexism it’s hard to tell what Jenkins means in describing trans women as gay or heterosexual. Now to me, trans people’s genders are legitimate, so a trans women attracted to men is heterosexual–but that’s not something one can safely assume with researchers (eg J Michael Bailey’s description of straight trans women as “homosexual transsexuals).

The sample size, as with a lot of the research I’ve seen on trans women is a bit small (22), but is understandable–academic research is often terrible on both transness and sex work, so the trust there isn’t going to be widespread.

Still, if you can get past the terrible phrasing, at least there’s some research specifically about trans women. And what it does reveal is that, on the whole, that trans women have a worse experience of sex work than both cissexual women and cissexual men. Some key stats in the study:

* trans women are more likely to do sex work to avoid poverty (27.3% compared to 15% for cis women and 6% for cis men).

* trans women were much more likely to feel that sex work put the client in a position of power over the escort (31% compared to 6% for cis women and 15% for cis men).

* 50% of trans women felt that clients did not treat them respectfully, compared to 16% of cis women and 15% of cis women.

* 41% of trans women had experienced violence, compared to 7% of cis men and 16% of cis women.

Now, what is striking about all of those numbers is how the negative aspects of sex work seem to be disproportionately affecting trans women sex workers. Now, this may be the result of a skewed survey considering the comparatively small size of the trans sample, but I’m willing to bet that it’s not. Even taking that into account, it seems clear that there is a quite specific problem for trans women. This undoubtedly has a lot to do with transphobia and homophobia on the part of punters, the perception that trans women are not “real” women (a perspective that the Jenkins report unfortunately seems to mirror in places). Given that 96% of trans women’s clients are cis men according to Jenkins, it seems likely that at least some punters may carry homophobic attitudes that affect their treatment of trans sex workers, the mixed desire/disgust that so often characterises our sexual relationships with cis men in general.

I agree with Viviane Namaste’s recent statement that there needs to be more research done with trans sex workers, with a focus on violence and HIV rates – for instance, Namaste has found HIV rates of up to 75% of trans sex workers in Rome. If Jenkins’ study is suggestive, we need to more clearly see the scope of what problems there are (as well as support sex workers are happy and working in good conditions of course), and sample sizes of 22 are definitely insufficient for the task.

Read Full Post »

Buddies and Brothels

That lovely creature Penny BBW of ample busoms and an even more ample heart got in touch with me and asked if I would pen an article for her Escort Buddy’s site. Anything for you Penny. :)

Given the current upsurge in discussion around paid sex and the implications for all parties concerned, it might be a good time to take stock of the changing role of the “Buddy”.

There are buddies at every level of the industry, whether they are older ladies at a parlour who take newbies under their wings, or escorts who support one and other or street workers who take a note of the registration number of cars their friends get into. The role they fulfil now is by and large one of practical advice and friendship, not to mention the safety aspect.

It is my belief ( and I’m not alone ) that if the industry is driven underground, by virtue of the client or the sex worker being criminalised then the role of the buddy will change irreparably. The focus will be very much geared towards keeping one and other away from detection and the authorities.

It is no coincidence that there is a high rate of violence against street workers and I would suggest that the reason for that is they are an easy target group. In many respects, they are alone, devoid of any monitoring or co-operation with law enforcement groups. If these women were working in licensed brothels, then they would be automatically afforded the luxury of several buddies at once. I appreciate that the suggested system is not immune to abuse, there will be women who will insist on continuing to work the streets, but at least the option would be there. Thinking back to the recent Ipswich murders, if any of the women were offered a safe alternative to continue to ply their trade, then who’s to say how many lives could have been saved.

Today I met and had lunch with a new lady who has come to me via the buddy system and I feel an overwhelming sense of protectiveness towards her. She is older than me and probably more worldly wise but when it comes to the joys of escorting, utterly green. It will be my pleasure to guide her as much as I can, as I feel that is infinitely preferable to bailing her out of a police station at 2am.

Laura

Read Full Post »

RTN cis onlyMy previous post (link here) has drawn me into looking further back along the organisational chain of command, and the results are as depressing and predictable as one might expect; as much for the failure of would-be allies as for the actual transphobia of the organisers.

Reclaim The Night and Feminism in London are both organised by the London Feminist Network and one commonality in all their literature is the use of the trans exclusionary phrase “women only”.

The problem arises because the term is grounded in the use of the long-established trope which states that transsexual women are “not really women” – hence my assertion that the phrase women only is trans exclusionary. The definition is essentialist in meaning as it infers that one can only be “born a woman” (and never “become a woman”, to paraphrase de Beauvoir), and in so doing it denies not only the existence and agency of transsexual women and transsexual men, but also the potential for change itself. Thus women comes to mean cis women, just as surely as women only means cis women only. The biological determinism underpinning this rationale ensures that these definitions become permanent, unquestionable, immutable dogma.

However, it also results in the anomalous situation we now see in the cases of both Feminism In London and Reclaim The Night where transsexual men (“really women”) will be welcomed to these events, at the same time as transsexual women (“really men”) will be excluded. The bias in favour of transsexual men not only makes use of one of the most offensive manifestations of transphobia – ungendering us – but silences and further marginalises transsexual women in the process: it is divisive too. At the same time, it reinforces the male/female binary which, in their next breath, those same cis women feminists will tell you they are committed to destroying – because, they reason, gender isn’t really absolute, determined by one’s genital configuration at birth, it is in fact a completely malleable, socially constructed concept.

LFN cis onlyBut regardless of the contorted and contradictory logic employed by LFN to exclude transsexual women, it’s interesting to note how the cis women feminist organisers then go on to avoid being called on their hidden transphobia by saying nothing explicitly about who is included in, and who is excluded from, the term women only. Their cis women feminist supporters at these events, who blithely go along with this hypocrisy by telling themselves that if transsexual women aren’t explicitly excluded then they must be implicitly included, are therefore not only complicit in the silencing of transsexual women, but their complacency allows the organisers to manipulate and exploit them in pursuit of this hidden transphobic agenda.

Which brings me to the real question: who decided this? How many people were responsible for implementing this trans exclusionary policy – and would they have been successful if the majority not been so apathetic? In a situation like this, saying nothing is no different to actively supporting the bigots. And given that transsexual women are highly unlikely to have access to the decision-making process, it falls to those cis women feminists who call themselves allies to take a stand on our behalf.

No more excuses, my sisters.

—————

Cross-posted from Bird of Paradox

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 501 other followers

%d bloggers like this: