Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for December, 2009

“There has been a significant amount of discussion recently in the public domain about the Escort/Sex Industry and in particular the recent proposal to outlaw and criminalise the sex industry in Scotland. Here I would like to add my own thoughts/opinions on this as a happy and satisfied client of escorts.

I will not try and convince people that every aspect of the ‘escort/sex industry’ is perfect and happy in the Garden of Eden. The ‘escort/sex industry’ like any industry is multi-faceted e.g.: financial sector, housing market and has bad parts as well as good parts, as does any industry. One can see the harmful/bad parts of the sex industry, by taking a walk/drive through parts of any large city to see poor woman and other young girls drugged out and often forced against their will to participate in this trade and harassed by numerous deployable men. Making the entire environment unpleasant for everyone living and working in the surrounding area and in turn this does a non-negligible amount of damage to society as a whole. This is clearly a problem and one that should be addressed. However, as stated above the sex industry is multi-faceted and it is important to realise that this is only one part albeit a bad part of a much larger industry. Solving one problem at the expense of the entire industry is no solution at all! Another part of the industry, is worked by intelligent hard-working woman, well aware of exactly what the work involves and are doing it through choice, one only has to talk them and listen to their views to find this out. The recent outing of Belle-de-Jour highlights this point. These women are honest law-abiding people making a valuable contribution to society; I will expand on this point in the following paragraph.

As stated above a vast majority of the women working as escorts make a valuable contribution to society, so let me justify this point, by perhaps first giving a personal perspective on why I use escorts. I personally use escorts because they provide an open honest service, without what might be considered by some additionally emotional baggage, they are private and discreet providing companionship, which is different from what I experience in my professional life and before anyone conjectures sex is not involved for me! Thus in the spirit of a change is as good as a rest, I always feel relaxed and refreshed after meeting with an escort and therefore I am able to work and perform better in my professional life. Often if I’m feeling slightly down, I only have to think of the many happy times I have spent with an escort and a smile soon returns and I’m ready to continue with my work. Therefore I conclude that these professional self-employed women make a valuable contribution to society, albeit indirectly, pay their taxes and support themselves and loved ones without being a burden to society.

If what is perceived to be a solution to one problematic part of the industry is rushed through with out proper consultation we will overnight make a large number of self-employed women unemployed with a corresponding avoidable/unnecessary financial strain on an already strained/stretched social benefits system.

However, if a proper solution is sort with full consultation between all those involved, e.g. law enforcement agencies, professional escorts and their clients, then a complete solution fully thought through can be obtained. To the benefit of all concerned. I will not claim to know what this solution is and to quote: Piet Hein: ‘Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back’, so a solution may not be easy to find, but that does not mean one should not try.

One of course may wish to take a moral stand and say the entire industry is deployable and should be stopped, as these women are selling their bodies! However, in this day and age do we all not sell the skills we have in one form or another. Models sell their looks, singers sell their voices and many people sell their minds. After all what right do any of us have to take away another persons free will, by stopping them making their own choices of what they choose to do, as long as it is not to the detriment of others of course. I for one certainly do not.

So please let everyone concerned sit down and discuss the problem and see what can be achieved, after all two minds are better than one.

In hopefully anticipation.

A satisfied client of professional escorts.”

Read Full Post »

When Ashley Met Mandy


Ashley Dupré (left), the escort linked with former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, has very little in common with her contemporary Jamie Jungers. Despite some recent allegations about escorting, Jamie (on morning TV!) denied any connection to prostitution while sharing the unhappy details of her relationship with Tiger Woods. My Daily Beast column, about women who thrive in scandal’s aftermath, takes a look at sex industry icons in different eras. Mandy Rice-Davies (right) has far more in common with Ashley than anyone else I can think of. But I would say that, wouldn’t I?

Follow me on Twitter, visit my website or send a comment to deartq@tracyquan.net

Thanks for reading!

Read Full Post »

It is a well know fact that luvvies when they reach a certain stage in their careers often feel the need to adopt a cause. Partly to show their adoring fans that they really do care about those less fortunate than themselves, partly because it looks very good in the “look what a good person I am” folder of their CV and possibly because they may even genuinely care about the issues involved. There is nothing wrong with any of the above. I am not adverse to celebrities and the luvvies of tinsel town using their fame to raise awareness of social and moral issues. As a keen supporter of animal rights and vegetarianism I am very aware that a celebrity denouncing fur or advocating a healthy vegetarian diet for example focuses media attention if nothing else.
I become concerned however when celebrities use their influence to advocate a political cause or support a particular ideological agenda where the issues are contentious or can have serious and even fatal consequences for innocent parties. This is particularly true with sex work where the ill thought out actions of celebrities can result in further emphasising the social stigma that is enshrined in legislation. For a celebrity to endorse and encourage legal discrimination is morally questionable if not objectionable.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/dec/18/journey-emma-thompson

The above Guardian article purports in the video to detail the experiences of a trafficked woman. I do not contest the authenticity of the experiences of this person because I do not know her. What I contest most strongly is the proposition that the experiences shown in a very theatrical and emotionally challenging manner are the realities of all sex workers or the realities of all foreign sex workers. I also contend her assumptions that criminalising men for buying sexual services is somehow going to right the wrongs committed against genuine trafficked victims. The problem Emma Thompson is that real life is not a piece of choreographed drama.
Emma Thomson has revealed a disturbing innocence about the sex industry and has made misguided assumptions that reveal a lack of knowledge of the experiences of sex workers which are many and varied some good and some sadly bad. It is easy and lazy to adopt a stance on an issue as controversial and stigmatised as sex work and to then endorse views that emotionalise negative experiences suffered by some women with out giving regard to the consequences for others. It is easy to achieve publicity by simplifying an issue into black and white and to find scapegoats that society can easily identify and demonise. It is convenient to ignore the other experiences of other sex workers and to dismiss their voices as unimportant. It is easier to endorse existing discrimination and even encourage more bad laws and to emphasise with opinions that will further disenfranchise sex workers than it is to challenge stigma and assumptions made by society about those socially disenfranchised. This however is what Emma Thomson has done and it is morally reprehensible from somehow who says that they care about women’s rights and one presumes human rights.
The assumption from Emma’s article and the accompanying video is that we have to assume that every Eastern European man is an evil trafficker/pimp and every foreign woman buying condoms in boots is a sex slave. Presumably we are to call the Poppy project at once and then the home office to let them know that we have found one at least of the four thousand sex slaves they seem to be unable to find yet still claim are around somewhere. It is a crude and dangerous naivety that in any other circumstances would quite rightly be denounced as racist. You see Emma Thomson nothing to do with sex is simple. To be foreign does not always mean you are trafficked by exploitative pimps and making assumptions about men who buy sex is naive and dangerous because by encouraging bad laws that criminalise men who buy sex is to not only criminalise the consensual sexual activity of many but worse alienates the very people ie clients and fellow sex workers who are best placed to inform on real cases of abuse and real cases of trafficking. Further criminalising an already criminalised industry will push it further underground which may make Emma Thomson and her friends feel better because it become invisible but it does nothing to help the vulnerable and actually creates an exploitable and corruptible market.

In the article Emma Thomson claims not to wish to return to Victorian values. Emma Thomson however adopts the attitudes that would have been very familiar to her Victorian sisters who using very similar language sallied forth to rescue fallen women. She like many who speak from privilege refuse to engage with the multifaceted industry she finds repugnant. Instead she like many of her fellow anti sex work sisters adopt attitudes of despair and despondency at any idea that women (men and trans persons who sell sex are usually excluded because it is harder to objectify us as victims) can and do make qualified choices to sell sexual services. Hidden behind the emotionalism of the video and the scattering of comments about sex and the despairing attitude toward the business of selling sex is a prudishness about sex and the affirmation of the age old patriarchal assumptions of good women and bad women. Worse with Emma Thomson there is it would appear a need on her part to save fallen foreign women because to her they are vulnerable. In much the same way as some men prey on vulnerable women in order to exploit them as seen in the video Emma’s Thomson likewise exploits those same women in order to feel useful and needed and to justify her squeamishness about human sexuality and in particular female sexuality. Some ageing actresses open rescue homes for stray animals. Emma Thomson now rescues foreign women if they like it or not. There is nothing wrong with being anti trafficking in deed it is laudable but in this article Emma Thomson reveals her distaste for any sexual behaviour which does not fit the prescribed normality she and others in the very lucrative rescue industry subscribe to.
Next time Emma Thomson totters on her Jimmy Choos for luncheon at the Ivy she should perhaps remember that nothing is black and white and that criminalising human behaviour of which sex is the most basic never works but actually creates more problems and more abuse. History exists to teach us this fact if we care to learn.

Read Full Post »

MULLED WINE AND CAROLS

This evening in Soho the IUSW (International Union of Sex Workers) hold what has become an annual festive event of Carol singing and mince pies and mulled wine. Walking the streets of Soho members of the IUSW and supporters aim to bring festive cheer to sex workers while raising awareness of the issues of violence against sex workers and to maintain and amplify our demand for protection from the law and not persecution.
With the support of local churches and other groups it is a special event in the Soho calendar as well as in the sex worker rights movement. It is now an event that is celebrated world wide. Celebrating the 17th of December as a day to raise awareness of the issue of violence toward sex workers began in America because one particularly brutal serial killer felt that such is the stigma attached to sex work because of the legal discrimination enshrined in law that he could kill sex workers with out fear of repercussions. Sadly he killed too many before being caught.
The recent policing and crime bill passed by this labour government in the UK further entrenched the stigma surrounding sex work and further eroded the relationship between sex workers and the police. It was a set back in the fight for sex workers rights and a betrayal of sex workers who presented copious amounts of evidence to support our claims for justice and recognition and protection under the law.
The betrayal of sex workers by this government and the use of exaggerated and hyper emotionalised evidence to justify yet more bad law has simply strengthened a determination to right the wrongs of centuries and to further cement an atmosphere of co operation among sex workers to fight for justice.
If you are in Soho please join the in the Carol singing and remember despite set backs and loosing the odd battle the war for sex workers rights will be won.

Read Full Post »

My day job is Web manager/writer for GRITtv with Laura Flanders. For the occasion of International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers, we ran this commentary and I thought I’d share it with you.

Read Full Post »

Via Sex Workers Outreach Project USA:

December 17th is International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers.

This event was created to call attention to hate crimes committed against sex workers all over the globe. Originally thought of by Dr. Annie Sprinkle and started by the Sex Workers Outreach Project USA as a memorial and vigil for the victims of the Green River Killer in Seattle, Washington.

International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers has empowered workers from over cities around the world to come together and organize against discrimination and remember victims of violence. During the week of December 17th, sex worker rights organizations will be staging actions and vigils to raise awareness about violence that is commonly committed against sex workers.

The assault, battery, rape and murder of sex workers must end. Existing laws prevent sex workers from reporting violence. The stigma and discrimination that is perpetuated by the prohibitionist laws has made violence against us acceptable. Please join with sex workers around the world and stand against criminalization and violence committed against prostitutes.

—————

Cross-posted at Bird of Paradox

Read Full Post »

That’s the insinuation of a mindless campaign in Copenhagen, during a high-profile conference on Climate Change. The postcard sent to delegates and hotels reads Be Sustainable – Don’t buy sex. Read about sex worker resistance: This is sheer discrimination. Ritt Bjerregaard is abusing her position as Lord Mayor in using her power to prevent us carrying out our perfectly legal job.

Read Full Post »


Earlier this year a sex workers union was formed in France. Now STRASS have announced numbers, types of workers who are members and spokespersons for different issues. I’ve moved the English translation to first place here; original French follows.

A new team for STRASS

December 8th, 2009

The STRASS, Syndicat du TRAvail Sexuel (Union of Sex Work) held its annual General Assembly this weekend and elected a new team for its board.

The union has officially reached the figure of 300 members and has set a policy priority for the coming year : the fight against prohibition. We will use the campaign for regional elections to raise awareness among the politiciens and the public opinion. We also expect the creation of a legal support office for our members.

In terms of sociology for the group we can say our members are approximately 70% women, 20% trans’, 10% of boys and a majority of our members work on the street.

The elected officials for 2010 are:

Office:
General Secretary : Cadyne 06 18 44 68 99
National Spokeswoman: Tiphaine Besnard 06 62 85 53 62
Treasurer: Nikita 06 87 66 18 09

Board of Directress:
Spokeswoman for South West France: Isabelle Schweiger
Spokeswomen for South East France: Plume and Leila
Spokeswoman for North East: Cornelia Schneider
International Relations: Thierry Schaffauser
Communication: Maitresse Gilda
Coordination Community Street Work: Nicole
Coordination Community Internet Telephone: Marquise
Coordination Community Clus, Bars, Parlours, Flats : Astrid
Coordination Community BDSM: Maitresse Leia

Une nouvelle équipe pour le STRASS
8 Decembre 2009

Le STRASS, Syndicat du TRAvail Sexuel a tenu son Assemblée Générale annuelle ce week-end et élu une nouvelle équipe pour son CA.

Le syndicat a officiellement atteint le chiffre des 300 adhésions et a fixé comme priorité politique pour l‘année à venir la lutte contre la prohibition. Nous profiterons de la campagne pour les élections régionales afin de sensibiliser la classe politique et l’opinion publique. Nous prévoyons également la création d’un poste de soutien juridique pour nos adhérents.

En termes de sociologie du groupe nous pouvons indiquer que nos membres se composent d’environ 70% de femmes, 20% de trans’, 10% de garçons et qu’une majorité de nos membres travaillent dans la rue.

Les éluEs pour 2010 sont :

Bureau :
Secrétaire Générale : Cadyne 06 18 44 68 99
Secrétaire Porte Parole Nationale : Tiphaine Besnard 06 62 85 53 62
Trésorier : Nikita 06 87 66 18 09

Conseil d’administration :

Porte Parole Sud Ouest : Isabelle Schweiger
Porte Parole Sud Est : Plume et Leila
Porte Parole Grand Est : Cornélia Schneider
Relations Internationales : Thierry Schaffauser
Communication : Maitresse Gilda
Lien communautaire Travail de rue : Nicole
Lien communautaire Internet/Téléphonie : Marquise
Lien communautaire Etablissements : Astrid
Lien communautaire BDSM : Maitresse Léia

Read Full Post »

Further to my recent post, an update has now been emailed to members of the Facebook group Trans inclusion in the Equality Bill – ACT NOW.

Subject: What happens next?

Hello everyone,

Thank you very, very much for joining this group, inviting your friends, and participating in the campaign. Amendments for the Equality Bill were discussed on Wednesday 2nd December, so we thought you’d like to know what happened on the day, and what we’re doing next.

Unfortunately – but not paticularly surprisingly – there were only a few hours set aside for debate and voting on amendments for the Equality Bill on Wednesday. This meant that there was very little discussion of the trans amendments, and there was not time for a vote upon them.

However:

At least 65 MPs were contacted about trans inclusion in the Equality Bill. This has meant that trans issues have not only remained “live”, but more politicians are aware of them than ever before, which bodes well for the future. This also demonstrates to the government that we are still concerned about equality for ALL trans people, and about protecting trans children from harassment in schools. It shows that we will not back down on issues such as these.

Speaking on Wednesday in the House of Commons, Lynne Featherstone MP noted that “The government has never fully understood the difference between gender reassignment and gender identity”. Hopefully we’re beginning to change that.

So, what happens next?

The Equality Bill will now move to the House of Lords, and a briefing paper for sympathetic Lords is being prepared. As part of this, there will need to be examples given of real people who will benefit from trans-friendly amendments to the Equality Bill. We will be sending out more information on that campaign soon to keep you up to date with what’s happening, and how you can contribute.

Updates will also be posted on this Facebook group and the blog at http://justfillingintheblanks.blogspot.com/.

Thanks again!

————

Cross-posted at Bird of Paradox and The F-Word

Read Full Post »

Hi, all. I haven’t blogged anything here yet, so I hope you’ll forgive me showing up like this. I’m Sarah. I blog at Alterdestiny and Season of the Bitch, but more frequent updates can be found on Tumblr and Twitter. I also write for Global Comment, and this is a piece I wrote there as part of a series on Rethinking Work. (Introduction is here.) I’ll post the first half here, and link to the rest, if you’re interested.

When rethinking work and what we consider work, many jobs that come to mind. Yet few are as fraught with tension and debate as sex work. Having sex, simulating sex, or implying sex for money is denigrated, threatened, questioned by the puritan Right and supposedly radical feminists alike, and yet so often the debate misses the point entirely.

Sure, sex work isn’t a job that most people dream of having. Neither is domestic labor, working at McDonald’s, being a waitress, or even being a secretary. Yet no one feels the need to write screeds about how degrading it is to humanity, or more often women, that people are forced to do those jobs.

I’m not the first person to say such a thing. No one ever wanted to save me from being a waitress the way they wanted to save my best friend from being a stripper.

So what does the difference boil down to? The sex, of course. The opposition to sex work stems from the same kind of purity myth that tells young women that if they have sex before marriage, they have nothing to offer their husband on their wedding night. The idea that you ARE your body, espoused in the phrase “selling yourself,” is what makes people blanch at the idea that sex work might just be another valid way to make a living.

I’m not getting metaphysical here—I want to stay in the materialist realm. So instead of talking about the soul or some higher plane, let’s interrogate for a moment the “selling your body” idea. After all, selling your body is what all of us who do wage labor do: we sell our bodies, our ability to work. Rather, we rent them out for a time. Sex work involves different body parts than most wage labor, most of the time, but where the concept splits gets a bit murky. Is it genitalia? Nudity? Bodies are just bodies, right? Is the construction worker’s job more degrading if he strips off his shirt in the summer heat and people ogle him walking by?

Read the rest.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 502 other followers

%d bloggers like this: